Mexico
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
92
Grants
37
Denials
55
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
58.7%
521 / 888
Total decisions
888
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
58.7%
Grants: 521
Denial rate
41.3%
Denials: 367
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch appointed Eva S. Saltzman to begin hearing cases in August 2016. Judge Saltzman earned a Bachelor of Arts degree in 1999 from the University of Wisconsin and a Juris Doctor in 2002 from the Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law. From 2006 to July 2016, she served as a supervisory staff attorney for the Staff Attorney’s Office, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, in New York. From 2005 through 2006, she served as an associate attorney for Wildes, Weinberg, Grunblatt & Wildes PC, in New York. From 2002 through 2005, she served as an associate attorney for Avirom & Associates LLP, in New York. Judge Saltzman is a member of the Connecticut, District of Columbia, and New York State Bars.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Eva S Saltzman.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mexico Sufficient sample | 92 | 37 | 55 | 40.2% | 59.8% | View details | |
Nicaragua Sufficient sample | 87 | 73 | 14 | 83.9% | 16.1% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 86 | 27 | 59 | 31.4% | 68.6% | View details | |
Switzerland Sufficient sample | 74 | 61 | 13 | 82.4% | 17.6% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 73 | 29 | 44 | 39.7% | 60.3% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 55 | 9 | 46 | 16.4% | 83.6% | View details | |
India Sufficient sample | 49 | 28 | 21 | 57.1% | 42.9% | View details | |
Venezuela Sufficient sample | 47 | 31 | 16 | 66.0% | 34.0% | View details | |
Niue Sufficient sample | 31 | 24 | 7 | 77.4% | 22.6% | View details | |
Moldova Moderate sample | 29 | 26 | 3 | 89.7% | 10.3% | View details | |
Cuba Moderate sample | 22 | 14 | 8 | 63.6% | 36.4% | View details | |
Iraq Moderate sample | 19 | 17 | 2 | 89.5% | 10.5% | View details | |
Kyrgyzstan Moderate sample | 19 | 14 | 5 | 73.7% | 26.3% | View details | |
Egypt Moderate sample | 15 | 13 | 2 | 86.7% | 13.3% | View details | |
Russia Moderate sample | 13 | 9 | 4 | 69.2% | 30.8% | View details | |
Haiti Moderate sample | 12 | 1 | 11 | 8.3% | 91.7% | View details | |
Syria Moderate sample | 12 | 12 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Pakistan Moderate sample | 11 | 3 | 8 | 27.3% | 72.7% | View details | |
Ukraine Moderate sample | 10 | 6 | 4 | 60.0% | 40.0% | View details | |
Ecuador Small sample | 9 | 0 | 9 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details |
Total decisions
92
Grants
37
Denials
55
Total decisions
87
Grants
73
Denials
14
Total decisions
86
Grants
27
Denials
59
Total decisions
74
Grants
61
Denials
13
Total decisions
73
Grants
29
Denials
44
Total decisions
55
Grants
9
Denials
46
Total decisions
49
Grants
28
Denials
21
Total decisions
47
Grants
31
Denials
16
Total decisions
31
Grants
24
Denials
7
Total decisions
29
Grants
26
Denials
3
Total decisions
22
Grants
14
Denials
8
Total decisions
19
Grants
17
Denials
2
Total decisions
19
Grants
14
Denials
5
Total decisions
15
Grants
13
Denials
2
Total decisions
13
Grants
9
Denials
4
Total decisions
12
Grants
1
Denials
11
Total decisions
12
Grants
12
Denials
0
Total decisions
11
Grants
3
Denials
8
Total decisions
10
Grants
6
Denials
4
Total decisions
9
Grants
0
Denials
9
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.