Spain
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
280
Grants
22
Denials
258
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
30.3%
534 / 1760
Total decisions
1760
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
30.3%
Grants: 534
Denial rate
69.7%
Denials: 1226
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Attorney General Jeff Sessions appointed Anita L. Simons to begin hearing cases in October 2018. Judge Simons earned dual Bachelor of Arts degrees in 1999 from the University of Arizona and a Juris Doctor in 2005 from the University of Arizona James E. Rogers College of Law. From 2013 to 2018, she served as an administrative law judge with the Executive Hearing Office, Arizona Department of Transportation. From 2007 to 2013, she was a deputy countyattorney with the Criminal Division, Pima County Attorney’s Office, in Arizona. Judge Simonsis a member of the State Bar of Arizona.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Anita L Simons.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Spain Sufficient sample | 280 | 22 | 258 | 7.9% | 92.1% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 276 | 12 | 264 | 4.3% | 95.7% | View details | |
Mexico Sufficient sample | 222 | 14 | 208 | 6.3% | 93.7% | View details | |
Switzerland Sufficient sample | 193 | 156 | 37 | 80.8% | 19.2% | View details | |
Niue Sufficient sample | 146 | 46 | 100 | 31.5% | 68.5% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 126 | 6 | 120 | 4.8% | 95.2% | View details | |
Russia Sufficient sample | 70 | 68 | 2 | 97.1% | 2.9% | View details | |
Colombia Sufficient sample | 68 | 9 | 59 | 13.2% | 86.8% | View details | |
Venezuela Sufficient sample | 59 | 20 | 39 | 33.9% | 66.1% | View details | |
India Sufficient sample | 50 | 39 | 11 | 78.0% | 22.0% | View details | |
Peru Sufficient sample | 46 | 5 | 41 | 10.9% | 89.1% | View details | |
Ecuador Moderate sample | 25 | 2 | 23 | 8.0% | 92.0% | View details | |
Iran Moderate sample | 25 | 23 | 2 | 92.0% | 8.0% | View details | |
Indonesia Moderate sample | 17 | 9 | 8 | 52.9% | 47.1% | View details | |
Jordan Moderate sample | 12 | 9 | 3 | 75.0% | 25.0% | View details | |
Philippines Moderate sample | 10 | 3 | 7 | 30.0% | 70.0% | View details | |
Armenia Small sample | 9 | 6 | 3 | 66.7% | 33.3% | View details | |
Egypt Small sample | 9 | 6 | 3 | 66.7% | 33.3% | View details | |
Syria Small sample | 9 | 8 | 1 | 88.9% | 11.1% | View details | |
Turkiye Small sample | 7 | 4 | 3 | 57.1% | 42.9% | View details |
Total decisions
280
Grants
22
Denials
258
Total decisions
276
Grants
12
Denials
264
Total decisions
222
Grants
14
Denials
208
Total decisions
193
Grants
156
Denials
37
Total decisions
146
Grants
46
Denials
100
Total decisions
126
Grants
6
Denials
120
Total decisions
70
Grants
68
Denials
2
Total decisions
68
Grants
9
Denials
59
Total decisions
59
Grants
20
Denials
39
Total decisions
50
Grants
39
Denials
11
Total decisions
46
Grants
5
Denials
41
Total decisions
25
Grants
2
Denials
23
Total decisions
25
Grants
23
Denials
2
Total decisions
17
Grants
9
Denials
8
Total decisions
12
Grants
9
Denials
3
Total decisions
10
Grants
3
Denials
7
Total decisions
9
Grants
6
Denials
3
Total decisions
9
Grants
6
Denials
3
Total decisions
9
Grants
8
Denials
1
Total decisions
7
Grants
4
Denials
3
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.