Mexico
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
123
Grants
12
Denials
111
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
29.6%
159 / 537
Total decisions
537
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
29.6%
Grants: 159
Denial rate
70.4%
Denials: 378
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch appointed Judge Simpson to begin hearing cases in November 2015. Judge Simpson received a Bachelor of Arts degree in 1995 from Wabash College and a Juris Doctor in 1998 from Seton Hall University. From 2006 through September 2015, Judge Simpson served as assistant chief counsel, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security, in Los Angeles and San Diego, Calif. From 1997 through 2006, both domestically and abroad, Judge Simpson served in various capacities as a member of the U.S. Navy’s Judge Advocate General’s Corps, including branch chief, officer in charge, and attorney. Judge Simpson is a member of the New Jersey Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Scott Simpson.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mexico Sufficient sample | 123 | 12 | 111 | 9.8% | 90.2% | View details | |
Russia Sufficient sample | 68 | 56 | 12 | 82.4% | 17.6% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 52 | 5 | 47 | 9.6% | 90.4% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 42 | 2 | 40 | 4.8% | 95.2% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 36 | 6 | 30 | 16.7% | 83.3% | View details | |
Cameroon Moderate sample | 19 | 9 | 10 | 47.4% | 52.6% | View details | |
Niue Moderate sample | 14 | 3 | 11 | 21.4% | 78.6% | View details | |
Switzerland Moderate sample | 14 | 6 | 8 | 42.9% | 57.1% | View details | |
Eritrea Moderate sample | 12 | 6 | 6 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Haiti Moderate sample | 10 | 0 | 10 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Iraq Moderate sample | 10 | 8 | 2 | 80.0% | 20.0% | View details | |
Somalia Small sample | 9 | 5 | 4 | 55.6% | 44.4% | View details | |
Venezuela Small sample | 9 | 1 | 8 | 11.1% | 88.9% | View details | |
Colombia Small sample | 8 | 2 | 6 | 25.0% | 75.0% | View details | |
Ghana Small sample | 8 | 2 | 6 | 25.0% | 75.0% | View details | |
Ethiopia Small sample | 7 | 4 | 3 | 57.1% | 42.9% | View details | |
Pakistan Small sample | 7 | 0 | 7 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Singapore Small sample | 6 | 2 | 4 | 33.3% | 66.7% | View details | |
Afghanistan Small sample | 5 | 5 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Iran Small sample | 5 | 3 | 2 | 60.0% | 40.0% | View details |
Total decisions
123
Grants
12
Denials
111
Total decisions
68
Grants
56
Denials
12
Total decisions
52
Grants
5
Denials
47
Total decisions
42
Grants
2
Denials
40
Total decisions
36
Grants
6
Denials
30
Total decisions
19
Grants
9
Denials
10
Total decisions
14
Grants
3
Denials
11
Total decisions
14
Grants
6
Denials
8
Total decisions
12
Grants
6
Denials
6
Total decisions
10
Grants
0
Denials
10
Total decisions
10
Grants
8
Denials
2
Total decisions
9
Grants
5
Denials
4
Total decisions
9
Grants
1
Denials
8
Total decisions
8
Grants
2
Denials
6
Total decisions
8
Grants
2
Denials
6
Total decisions
7
Grants
4
Denials
3
Total decisions
7
Grants
0
Denials
7
Total decisions
6
Grants
2
Denials
4
Total decisions
5
Grants
5
Denials
0
Total decisions
5
Grants
3
Denials
2
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.