Brazil
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
717
Grants
119
Denials
598
Grant rate: 16.6%Denial rate: 83.4%
Immigration judge
Mario J Sturla
Community discussion · 0Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
- Status
- active
- Data source
- EOIR Case Data
Grant rate
35.0%
700 / 1997
Total decisions
1997
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
35.0%
Grants: 700
Denial rate
65.0%
Denials: 1297
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
Judge profile
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch appointed Mario J. Sturla to begin hearing cases in September 2016. Judge Sturla earned a Bachelor of Arts degree in 2003 from Brown University and Juris Doctor in 2006 from the Yeshiva University Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law. From 2015 to September 2016, he served as a deputy chief counsel, and previously from 2008 through 2015 as an assistant chief counsel, for the Office of the Chief Counsel, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security, in Boston. From 2007 through 2008, he served as a staff attorney for the Office of Legal Affairs, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, in New York City. From 2006 through 2007, he served as a judicial law clerk for the New York City Immigration Court, Executive Office for Immigration Review, Department of Justice, entering on duty through the Attorney General’s Honors Program. Judge Sturla is a member of the Massachusetts Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Outcome distribution
Grants700 / 1997
Denials1297 / 1997
Other relief0 / 1997
Community perspective
Community discussion
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Mario J Sturla.
0 topics
You can start with these public topics
- Share a public process or preparation experience
- Discuss how to interpret public data
- Ask a question without personal case details
Case details
0 rowsThis table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Case Ratio
-
Distribution
Showing 0 of 0
View by applicant nationality
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Brazil Sufficient sample | 717 | 119 | 598 | 16.6% | 83.4% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 288 | 119 | 169 | 41.3% | 58.7% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 258 | 107 | 151 | 41.5% | 58.5% | View details | |
Ecuador Sufficient sample | 146 | 67 | 79 | 45.9% | 54.1% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 109 | 50 | 59 | 45.9% | 54.1% | View details | |
Colombia Sufficient sample | 76 | 18 | 58 | 23.7% | 76.3% | View details | |
Haiti Sufficient sample | 55 | 23 | 32 | 41.8% | 58.2% | View details | |
Dominican Republic Sufficient sample | 31 | 11 | 20 | 35.5% | 64.5% | View details | |
India Moderate sample | 24 | 10 | 14 | 41.7% | 58.3% | View details | |
Democratic Republic Of Congo Moderate sample | 22 | 13 | 9 | 59.1% | 40.9% | View details | |
Switzerland Moderate sample | 20 | 15 | 5 | 75.0% | 25.0% | View details | |
Mexico Moderate sample | 18 | 3 | 15 | 16.7% | 83.3% | View details | |
Peru Moderate sample | 17 | 7 | 10 | 41.2% | 58.8% | View details | |
Turkiye Moderate sample | 16 | 13 | 3 | 81.3% | 18.8% | View details | |
Egypt Moderate sample | 15 | 12 | 3 | 80.0% | 20.0% | View details | |
Uganda Moderate sample | 13 | 12 | 1 | 92.3% | 7.7% | View details | |
Central African Republic Moderate sample | 11 | 8 | 3 | 72.7% | 27.3% | View details | |
Russia Moderate sample | 10 | 6 | 4 | 60.0% | 40.0% | View details | |
Cameroon Small sample | 9 | 6 | 3 | 66.7% | 33.3% | View details | |
Côte d’Ivoire Small sample | 9 | 3 | 6 | 33.3% | 66.7% | View details |
View details
Guatemala
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
288
Grants
119
Denials
169
Grant rate: 41.3%Denial rate: 58.7%
Spain
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
258
Grants
107
Denials
151
Grant rate: 41.5%Denial rate: 58.5%
Ecuador
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
146
Grants
67
Denials
79
Grant rate: 45.9%Denial rate: 54.1%
Honduras
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
109
Grants
50
Denials
59
Grant rate: 45.9%Denial rate: 54.1%
Colombia
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
76
Grants
18
Denials
58
Grant rate: 23.7%Denial rate: 76.3%
Haiti
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
55
Grants
23
Denials
32
Grant rate: 41.8%Denial rate: 58.2%
Dominican Republic
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
31
Grants
11
Denials
20
Grant rate: 35.5%Denial rate: 64.5%
India
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
24
Grants
10
Denials
14
Grant rate: 41.7%Denial rate: 58.3%
Democratic Republic Of Congo
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
22
Grants
13
Denials
9
Grant rate: 59.1%Denial rate: 40.9%
Switzerland
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
20
Grants
15
Denials
5
Grant rate: 75.0%Denial rate: 25.0%
Mexico
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
18
Grants
3
Denials
15
Grant rate: 16.7%Denial rate: 83.3%
Peru
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
17
Grants
7
Denials
10
Grant rate: 41.2%Denial rate: 58.8%
Turkiye
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
16
Grants
13
Denials
3
Grant rate: 81.3%Denial rate: 18.8%
Egypt
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
15
Grants
12
Denials
3
Grant rate: 80.0%Denial rate: 20.0%
Uganda
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
13
Grants
12
Denials
1
Grant rate: 92.3%Denial rate: 7.7%
Central African Republic
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
11
Grants
8
Denials
3
Grant rate: 72.7%Denial rate: 27.3%
Russia
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
10
Grants
6
Denials
4
Grant rate: 60.0%Denial rate: 40.0%
Cameroon
Small sampleTotal decisions
9
Grants
6
Denials
3
Grant rate: 66.7%Denial rate: 33.3%
Côte d’Ivoire
Small sampleTotal decisions
9
Grants
3
Denials
6
Grant rate: 33.3%Denial rate: 66.7%
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Other judges at the same immigration court
Steven V. Adler
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 66.1%
- Denial Rate
- 33.9%
Sarah Cade
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 48.5%
- Denial Rate
- 51.5%
Francis L. Cramer
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 39.9%
- Denial Rate
- 60.1%
Billino W D'Ambrosio
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 7.9%
- Denial Rate
- 92.1%
Matthew J. D'Angelo
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 50.7%
- Denial Rate
- 49.3%
Steven F. Day
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 21.8%
- Denial Rate
- 78.2%
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.