Honduras
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
157
Grants
9
Denials
148
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
14.3%
111 / 779
Total decisions
779
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
14.3%
Grants: 111
Denial rate
85.8%
Denials: 668
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Then-Attorney General Jeff Sessions appointed Christopher J. Thielemann to begin hearing casesin November 2018. Judge Thielemann earned a Bachelor of Science in 1994 from Georgia Southern University, a Juris Doctor in 2002 from Florida State University College of Law, and a Master of Laws in 2009 from the Judge Advocate General’s Legal Center and School. From 2015 to 2018, he served as an assistant U.S. attorney with the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of Florida, Department of Justice, in Tallahassee. From 2002 to 2015, heserved as a judge advocate with the U.S. Marine Corps in the following locations: Camp Pendleton, California; Horn of Africa, Djibouti; and Camp Butler, Okinawa, Japan. Judge Thielemann is a member of the Florida Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Christopher J Thielemann.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Honduras Sufficient sample | 157 | 9 | 148 | 5.7% | 94.3% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 132 | 3 | 129 | 2.3% | 97.7% | View details | |
Mexico Sufficient sample | 93 | 0 | 93 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Venezuela Sufficient sample | 74 | 17 | 57 | 23.0% | 77.0% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 73 | 8 | 65 | 11.0% | 89.0% | View details | |
Cuba Sufficient sample | 58 | 10 | 48 | 17.2% | 82.8% | View details | |
Niue Moderate sample | 22 | 4 | 18 | 18.2% | 81.8% | View details | |
Colombia Moderate sample | 20 | 2 | 18 | 10.0% | 90.0% | View details | |
Romania Moderate sample | 15 | 0 | 15 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Afghanistan Moderate sample | 13 | 12 | 1 | 92.3% | 7.7% | View details | |
Cameroon Moderate sample | 12 | 8 | 4 | 66.7% | 33.3% | View details | |
Eritrea Small sample | 9 | 5 | 4 | 55.6% | 44.4% | View details | |
India Small sample | 9 | 0 | 9 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Nicaragua Small sample | 9 | 1 | 8 | 11.1% | 88.9% | View details | |
Peru Small sample | 7 | 0 | 7 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Switzerland Small sample | 7 | 3 | 4 | 42.9% | 57.1% | View details | |
Bulgaria Small sample | 6 | 1 | 5 | 16.7% | 83.3% | View details | |
Russia Small sample | 6 | 1 | 5 | 16.7% | 83.3% | View details | |
Turkiye Small sample | 6 | 5 | 1 | 83.3% | 16.7% | View details | |
Egypt Small sample | 4 | 4 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details |
Total decisions
157
Grants
9
Denials
148
Total decisions
132
Grants
3
Denials
129
Total decisions
93
Grants
0
Denials
93
Total decisions
74
Grants
17
Denials
57
Total decisions
73
Grants
8
Denials
65
Total decisions
58
Grants
10
Denials
48
Total decisions
22
Grants
4
Denials
18
Total decisions
20
Grants
2
Denials
18
Total decisions
15
Grants
0
Denials
15
Total decisions
13
Grants
12
Denials
1
Total decisions
12
Grants
8
Denials
4
Total decisions
9
Grants
5
Denials
4
Total decisions
9
Grants
0
Denials
9
Total decisions
9
Grants
1
Denials
8
Total decisions
7
Grants
0
Denials
7
Total decisions
7
Grants
3
Denials
4
Total decisions
6
Grants
1
Denials
5
Total decisions
6
Grants
1
Denials
5
Total decisions
6
Grants
5
Denials
1
Total decisions
4
Grants
4
Denials
0
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.