Switzerland
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
256
Grants
201
Denials
55
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
48.5%
615 / 1269
Total decisions
1269
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
48.5%
Grants: 615
Denial rate
51.5%
Denials: 654
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Attorney General William P. Barr appointed Scott E. Thomsen as an immigration judge in March 2020. Judge Thomsen earned a Bachelor of Science in 1988 and a Juris Doctor in 1991 from Brigham Young University. From 1995 to 2020, he served as the associate circuit judge for Bollinger County, Missouri. From 1992 to 1994, he was an assistant public defender for the 32ndand 33rd Judicial Circuits of Missouri, in Jackson. Judge Thomsen is a member of the Missouri State Bar, Nevada State Bar, and Utah State Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Scott Thomsen.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Switzerland Sufficient sample | 256 | 201 | 55 | 78.5% | 21.5% | View details | |
Venezuela Sufficient sample | 126 | 60 | 66 | 47.6% | 52.4% | View details | |
India Sufficient sample | 123 | 49 | 74 | 39.8% | 60.2% | View details | |
Niue Sufficient sample | 101 | 12 | 89 | 11.9% | 88.1% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 97 | 14 | 83 | 14.4% | 85.6% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 68 | 20 | 48 | 29.4% | 70.6% | View details | |
Mexico Sufficient sample | 65 | 11 | 54 | 16.9% | 83.1% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 63 | 31 | 32 | 49.2% | 50.8% | View details | |
Nicaragua Sufficient sample | 58 | 24 | 34 | 41.4% | 58.6% | View details | |
Bulgaria Sufficient sample | 49 | 36 | 13 | 73.5% | 26.5% | View details | |
Nepal Sufficient sample | 45 | 28 | 17 | 62.2% | 37.8% | View details | |
Albania Moderate sample | 25 | 21 | 4 | 84.0% | 16.0% | View details | |
Pakistan Moderate sample | 18 | 16 | 2 | 88.9% | 11.1% | View details | |
Haiti Moderate sample | 17 | 7 | 10 | 41.2% | 58.8% | View details | |
Colombia Moderate sample | 15 | 2 | 13 | 13.3% | 86.7% | View details | |
Ecuador Moderate sample | 11 | 2 | 9 | 18.2% | 81.8% | View details | |
Former Countries Moderate sample | 11 | 10 | 1 | 90.9% | 9.1% | View details | |
Bolivia Moderate sample | 10 | 7 | 3 | 70.0% | 30.0% | View details | |
Mauritania Small sample | 9 | 3 | 6 | 33.3% | 66.7% | View details | |
Russia Small sample | 8 | 5 | 3 | 62.5% | 37.5% | View details |
Total decisions
256
Grants
201
Denials
55
Total decisions
126
Grants
60
Denials
66
Total decisions
123
Grants
49
Denials
74
Total decisions
101
Grants
12
Denials
89
Total decisions
97
Grants
14
Denials
83
Total decisions
68
Grants
20
Denials
48
Total decisions
65
Grants
11
Denials
54
Total decisions
63
Grants
31
Denials
32
Total decisions
58
Grants
24
Denials
34
Total decisions
49
Grants
36
Denials
13
Total decisions
45
Grants
28
Denials
17
Total decisions
25
Grants
21
Denials
4
Total decisions
18
Grants
16
Denials
2
Total decisions
17
Grants
7
Denials
10
Total decisions
15
Grants
2
Denials
13
Total decisions
11
Grants
2
Denials
9
Total decisions
11
Grants
10
Denials
1
Total decisions
10
Grants
7
Denials
3
Total decisions
9
Grants
3
Denials
6
Total decisions
8
Grants
5
Denials
3
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.