Colombia
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
103
Grants
2
Denials
101
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
14.4%
117 / 811
Total decisions
811
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
14.4%
Grants: 117
Denial rate
85.6%
Denials: 694
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Attorney General William P. Barr appointed Michael A. Tripi as an immigration judge in June 2020. Judge Tripi earned a Bachelor of Science in 2004 from Kent State University and a Juris Doctor in 2007 from Cleveland State University, Cleveland-Marshall College of Law. From 2009 to 2020, he served as an assistant chief counsel, Office of Chief Counsel, Office of the Principal Legal Advisor, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security, in Cleveland. From 2007 to 2009, he served as an assistant prosecutor with the Summit County Prosecutor’s Office, in Akron, Ohio. Judge Tripi is a member of the Ohio State Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Michael Tripi.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Colombia Sufficient sample | 103 | 2 | 101 | 1.9% | 98.1% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 79 | 4 | 75 | 5.1% | 94.9% | View details | |
Mauritania Sufficient sample | 76 | 5 | 71 | 6.6% | 93.4% | View details | |
Niue Sufficient sample | 75 | 9 | 66 | 12.0% | 88.0% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 69 | 3 | 66 | 4.3% | 95.7% | View details | |
Mexico Sufficient sample | 52 | 2 | 50 | 3.8% | 96.2% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 37 | 8 | 29 | 21.6% | 78.4% | View details | |
Venezuela Sufficient sample | 37 | 13 | 24 | 35.1% | 64.9% | View details | |
Peru Moderate sample | 29 | 0 | 29 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Singapore Moderate sample | 27 | 1 | 26 | 3.7% | 96.3% | View details | |
Uzbekistan Moderate sample | 26 | 1 | 25 | 3.8% | 96.2% | View details | |
Brazil Moderate sample | 23 | 0 | 23 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Cameroon Moderate sample | 21 | 12 | 9 | 57.1% | 42.9% | View details | |
Russia Moderate sample | 20 | 10 | 10 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Turkiye Moderate sample | 14 | 13 | 1 | 92.9% | 7.1% | View details | |
Ghana Moderate sample | 12 | 0 | 12 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
India Small sample | 8 | 1 | 7 | 12.5% | 87.5% | View details | |
Guinea Small sample | 7 | 1 | 6 | 14.3% | 85.7% | View details | |
Nicaragua Small sample | 7 | 1 | 6 | 14.3% | 85.7% | View details | |
Pakistan Small sample | 6 | 1 | 5 | 16.7% | 83.3% | View details |
Total decisions
103
Grants
2
Denials
101
Total decisions
79
Grants
4
Denials
75
Total decisions
76
Grants
5
Denials
71
Total decisions
75
Grants
9
Denials
66
Total decisions
69
Grants
3
Denials
66
Total decisions
52
Grants
2
Denials
50
Total decisions
37
Grants
8
Denials
29
Total decisions
37
Grants
13
Denials
24
Total decisions
29
Grants
0
Denials
29
Total decisions
27
Grants
1
Denials
26
Total decisions
26
Grants
1
Denials
25
Total decisions
23
Grants
0
Denials
23
Total decisions
21
Grants
12
Denials
9
Total decisions
20
Grants
10
Denials
10
Total decisions
14
Grants
13
Denials
1
Total decisions
12
Grants
0
Denials
12
Total decisions
8
Grants
1
Denials
7
Total decisions
7
Grants
1
Denials
6
Total decisions
7
Grants
1
Denials
6
Total decisions
6
Grants
1
Denials
5
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.