Switzerland
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
542
Grants
384
Denials
158
Grant rate: 70.8%Denial rate: 29.2%
Immigration judge
Gita Vahid-Tehrani
Community discussion · 0Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
- Status
- active
- Data source
- EOIR Case Data
Grant rate
57.9%
1064 / 1837
Total decisions
1837
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
57.9%
Grants: 1064
Denial rate
42.1%
Denials: 773
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
Judge profile
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Judge Vahid-Tehrani was appointed as an Immigration Judge in January 2002. She received a Bachelor of Arts degree in 1984 from the University of California at Los Angeles, and a Juris Doctorate from Whittier School of Law in 1991. She served as assistant district counsel for the former Immigration and Naturalization Service in Los Angeles from October 1991 to January 2002. Judge Vahid-Tehrani is a member of the California and Pennsylvania Bars.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Outcome distribution
Grants1064 / 1837
Denials773 / 1837
Other relief0 / 1837
Community perspective
Community discussion
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Gita Vahid-Tehrani.
0 topics
You can start with these public topics
- Share a public process or preparation experience
- Discuss how to interpret public data
- Ask a question without personal case details
Case details
0 rowsThis table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Case Ratio
-
Distribution
Showing 0 of 0
View by applicant nationality
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Switzerland Sufficient sample | 542 | 384 | 158 | 70.8% | 29.2% | View details | |
Armenia Sufficient sample | 195 | 137 | 58 | 70.3% | 29.7% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 161 | 29 | 132 | 18.0% | 82.0% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 151 | 40 | 111 | 26.5% | 73.5% | View details | |
Indonesia Sufficient sample | 111 | 56 | 55 | 50.5% | 49.5% | View details | |
Mexico Sufficient sample | 109 | 24 | 85 | 22.0% | 78.0% | View details | |
Iran Sufficient sample | 68 | 52 | 16 | 76.5% | 23.5% | View details | |
Russia Sufficient sample | 55 | 41 | 14 | 74.5% | 25.5% | View details | |
Egypt Sufficient sample | 47 | 41 | 6 | 87.2% | 12.8% | View details | |
India Sufficient sample | 42 | 30 | 12 | 71.4% | 28.6% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 33 | 6 | 27 | 18.2% | 81.8% | View details | |
Syria Moderate sample | 29 | 25 | 4 | 86.2% | 13.8% | View details | |
Colombia Moderate sample | 26 | 17 | 9 | 65.4% | 34.6% | View details | |
Philippines Moderate sample | 18 | 10 | 8 | 55.6% | 44.4% | View details | |
Kenya Moderate sample | 16 | 12 | 4 | 75.0% | 25.0% | View details | |
Former Countries Moderate sample | 15 | 12 | 3 | 80.0% | 20.0% | View details | |
Nepal Moderate sample | 15 | 13 | 2 | 86.7% | 13.3% | View details | |
Pakistan Moderate sample | 12 | 6 | 6 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Jordan Small sample | 9 | 8 | 1 | 88.9% | 11.1% | View details | |
Niue Small sample | 9 | 5 | 4 | 55.6% | 44.4% | View details |
View details
Armenia
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
195
Grants
137
Denials
58
Grant rate: 70.3%Denial rate: 29.7%
Spain
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
161
Grants
29
Denials
132
Grant rate: 18.0%Denial rate: 82.0%
Guatemala
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
151
Grants
40
Denials
111
Grant rate: 26.5%Denial rate: 73.5%
Indonesia
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
111
Grants
56
Denials
55
Grant rate: 50.5%Denial rate: 49.5%
Mexico
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
109
Grants
24
Denials
85
Grant rate: 22.0%Denial rate: 78.0%
Iran
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
68
Grants
52
Denials
16
Grant rate: 76.5%Denial rate: 23.5%
Russia
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
55
Grants
41
Denials
14
Grant rate: 74.5%Denial rate: 25.5%
Egypt
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
47
Grants
41
Denials
6
Grant rate: 87.2%Denial rate: 12.8%
India
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
42
Grants
30
Denials
12
Grant rate: 71.4%Denial rate: 28.6%
Honduras
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
33
Grants
6
Denials
27
Grant rate: 18.2%Denial rate: 81.8%
Syria
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
29
Grants
25
Denials
4
Grant rate: 86.2%Denial rate: 13.8%
Colombia
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
26
Grants
17
Denials
9
Grant rate: 65.4%Denial rate: 34.6%
Philippines
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
18
Grants
10
Denials
8
Grant rate: 55.6%Denial rate: 44.4%
Kenya
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
16
Grants
12
Denials
4
Grant rate: 75.0%Denial rate: 25.0%
Former Countries
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
15
Grants
12
Denials
3
Grant rate: 80.0%Denial rate: 20.0%
Nepal
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
15
Grants
13
Denials
2
Grant rate: 86.7%Denial rate: 13.3%
Pakistan
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
12
Grants
6
Denials
6
Grant rate: 50.0%Denial rate: 50.0%
Jordan
Small sampleTotal decisions
9
Grants
8
Denials
1
Grant rate: 88.9%Denial rate: 11.1%
Niue
Small sampleTotal decisions
9
Grants
5
Denials
4
Grant rate: 55.6%Denial rate: 44.4%
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Other judges at the same immigration court
Janette L Allen
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 42.6%
- Denial Rate
- 57.4%
Dale E. Anderson
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 2.6%
- Denial Rate
- 97.4%
Peter L. Ashman
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 0.0%
- Denial Rate
- 0.0%
Joyce Bakke Varzandeh
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 42.2%
- Denial Rate
- 57.8%
Ira Bank
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 28.0%
- Denial Rate
- 72.0%
Lori R. Bass
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 40.4%
- Denial Rate
- 59.6%
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.