Switzerland
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
1818
Grants
410
Denials
1408
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
24.1%
1333 / 5525
Total decisions
5525
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
24.1%
Grants: 1333
Denial rate
75.9%
Denials: 4192
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Judge Videla was appointed as an Immigration Judge in February 1994. He received a Bachelor of Arts degree from the University of Illinois in 1975, and a Juris Doctorate from Northwestern University in 1978. Judge Videla was in private practice from 1981 to 1994 in Chicago, Illinois. From 1978 to 1981, he worked as an associate attorney for William Siebert & Associates, also in Chicago. He is a member of the Illinois Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Gabriel C Videla.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Switzerland Sufficient sample | 1818 | 410 | 1408 | 22.6% | 77.4% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 539 | 32 | 507 | 5.9% | 94.1% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 421 | 46 | 375 | 10.9% | 89.1% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 280 | 43 | 237 | 15.4% | 84.6% | View details | |
India Sufficient sample | 160 | 13 | 147 | 8.1% | 91.9% | View details | |
Albania Sufficient sample | 155 | 81 | 74 | 52.3% | 47.7% | View details | |
Bulgaria Sufficient sample | 155 | 19 | 136 | 12.3% | 87.7% | View details | |
Mauritania Sufficient sample | 150 | 29 | 121 | 19.3% | 80.7% | View details | |
Haiti Sufficient sample | 128 | 17 | 111 | 13.3% | 86.7% | View details | |
Pakistan Sufficient sample | 120 | 20 | 100 | 16.7% | 83.3% | View details | |
Former Countries Sufficient sample | 109 | 69 | 40 | 63.3% | 36.7% | View details | |
Russia Sufficient sample | 108 | 50 | 58 | 46.3% | 53.7% | View details | |
Guinea Sufficient sample | 107 | 38 | 69 | 35.5% | 64.5% | View details | |
Colombia Sufficient sample | 67 | 37 | 30 | 55.2% | 44.8% | View details | |
Ghana Sufficient sample | 61 | 1 | 60 | 1.6% | 98.4% | View details | |
Mexico Sufficient sample | 60 | 6 | 54 | 10.0% | 90.0% | View details | |
Indonesia Sufficient sample | 51 | 16 | 35 | 31.4% | 68.6% | View details | |
Nepal Sufficient sample | 50 | 28 | 22 | 56.0% | 44.0% | View details | |
Egypt Sufficient sample | 48 | 36 | 12 | 75.0% | 25.0% | View details | |
Venezuela Sufficient sample | 48 | 31 | 17 | 64.6% | 35.4% | View details |
Total decisions
1818
Grants
410
Denials
1408
Total decisions
539
Grants
32
Denials
507
Total decisions
421
Grants
46
Denials
375
Total decisions
280
Grants
43
Denials
237
Total decisions
160
Grants
13
Denials
147
Total decisions
155
Grants
81
Denials
74
Total decisions
155
Grants
19
Denials
136
Total decisions
150
Grants
29
Denials
121
Total decisions
128
Grants
17
Denials
111
Total decisions
120
Grants
20
Denials
100
Total decisions
109
Grants
69
Denials
40
Total decisions
108
Grants
50
Denials
58
Total decisions
107
Grants
38
Denials
69
Total decisions
67
Grants
37
Denials
30
Total decisions
61
Grants
1
Denials
60
Total decisions
60
Grants
6
Denials
54
Total decisions
51
Grants
16
Denials
35
Total decisions
50
Grants
28
Denials
22
Total decisions
48
Grants
36
Denials
12
Total decisions
48
Grants
31
Denials
17
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.