India
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
158
Grants
142
Denials
16
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
70.7%
487 / 689
Total decisions
689
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
70.7%
Grants: 487
Denial rate
29.3%
Denials: 202
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch appointed Elizabeth L. Young to begin hearing cases in September 2016. Judge Young earned a Bachelor of Arts degree in 1999 from Hendrix College and a Juris Doctor in 2004 from The George Washington University School of Law. From 2011 to September 2016, she served as an associate professor of law, and previously from 2008 through 2011 as an assistant professor of law, for the University of Arkansas School of Law. From 2007 through 2008, she served as a visiting professor at The George Washington University School of Law. From 2004 through 2007, she served as an attorney advisor for the San Francisco Immigration Court, Executive Office for Immigration Review, Department of Justice. Judge Young is a member of the Arkansas Bar, the State Bar of California, and the Virginia State Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Elizabeth L Young.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
India Sufficient sample | 158 | 142 | 16 | 89.9% | 10.1% | View details | |
Mexico Sufficient sample | 119 | 49 | 70 | 41.2% | 58.8% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 105 | 71 | 34 | 67.6% | 32.4% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 95 | 61 | 34 | 64.2% | 35.8% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 54 | 41 | 13 | 75.9% | 24.1% | View details | |
Switzerland Sufficient sample | 35 | 29 | 6 | 82.9% | 17.1% | View details | |
Nepal Moderate sample | 29 | 26 | 3 | 89.7% | 10.3% | View details | |
Brazil Small sample | 9 | 1 | 8 | 11.1% | 88.9% | View details | |
Eritrea Small sample | 6 | 6 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Syria Small sample | 6 | 6 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Afghanistan Small sample | 5 | 5 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Indonesia Small sample | 5 | 1 | 4 | 20.0% | 80.0% | View details | |
Madagascar Small sample | 5 | 5 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Niue Small sample | 5 | 2 | 3 | 40.0% | 60.0% | View details | |
Ukraine Small sample | 5 | 5 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Ethiopia Small sample | 4 | 4 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Cameroon Small sample | 3 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Moldova Small sample | 3 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Nicaragua Small sample | 3 | 2 | 1 | 66.7% | 33.3% | View details | |
Russia Small sample | 3 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details |
Total decisions
158
Grants
142
Denials
16
Total decisions
119
Grants
49
Denials
70
Total decisions
105
Grants
71
Denials
34
Total decisions
95
Grants
61
Denials
34
Total decisions
54
Grants
41
Denials
13
Total decisions
35
Grants
29
Denials
6
Total decisions
29
Grants
26
Denials
3
Total decisions
9
Grants
1
Denials
8
Total decisions
6
Grants
6
Denials
0
Total decisions
6
Grants
6
Denials
0
Total decisions
5
Grants
5
Denials
0
Total decisions
5
Grants
1
Denials
4
Total decisions
5
Grants
5
Denials
0
Total decisions
5
Grants
2
Denials
3
Total decisions
5
Grants
5
Denials
0
Total decisions
4
Grants
4
Denials
0
Total decisions
3
Grants
3
Denials
0
Total decisions
3
Grants
3
Denials
0
Total decisions
3
Grants
2
Denials
1
Total decisions
3
Grants
3
Denials
0
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.