Switzerland
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
1321
Grants
1093
Denials
228
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
77.3%
2228 / 2881
Total decisions
2881
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
77.3%
Grants: 2228
Denial rate
22.7%
Denials: 653
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Judge Zagzoug received a bachelor of arts degree in 1986 from College of Staten Islandand a juris doctorate degree in 1990 from Seton Hall University School of Law. From 1995 to April 2010, Judge Zagzoug served as an attorney for the Department of Homeland Security,Immigration and Customs Enforcement. From 1991 to 1993, she served as supervisory asylum officer and acting director for the former Immigration and Naturalization Service in Lyndhurst, N.J. Judge Zagzoug is a member of the New York State Bar and New Jersey State Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Randa Zagzoug.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Switzerland Sufficient sample | 1321 | 1093 | 228 | 82.7% | 17.3% | View details | |
India Sufficient sample | 298 | 232 | 66 | 77.9% | 22.1% | View details | |
Bulgaria Sufficient sample | 113 | 91 | 22 | 80.5% | 19.5% | View details | |
Nepal Sufficient sample | 113 | 101 | 12 | 89.4% | 10.6% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 86 | 39 | 47 | 45.3% | 54.7% | View details | |
Former Countries Sufficient sample | 85 | 80 | 5 | 94.1% | 5.9% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 70 | 40 | 30 | 57.1% | 42.9% | View details | |
Russia Sufficient sample | 67 | 59 | 8 | 88.1% | 11.9% | View details | |
Ecuador Sufficient sample | 61 | 19 | 42 | 31.1% | 68.9% | View details | |
Pakistan Sufficient sample | 42 | 28 | 14 | 66.7% | 33.3% | View details | |
Albania Sufficient sample | 39 | 35 | 4 | 89.7% | 10.3% | View details | |
Venezuela Sufficient sample | 35 | 23 | 12 | 65.7% | 34.3% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 34 | 13 | 21 | 38.2% | 61.8% | View details | |
Colombia Moderate sample | 28 | 10 | 18 | 35.7% | 64.3% | View details | |
Sri Lanka Moderate sample | 28 | 20 | 8 | 71.4% | 28.6% | View details | |
Egypt Moderate sample | 25 | 25 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Mexico Moderate sample | 25 | 8 | 17 | 32.0% | 68.0% | View details | |
Bolivia Moderate sample | 22 | 21 | 1 | 95.5% | 4.5% | View details | |
Uzbekistan Moderate sample | 20 | 14 | 6 | 70.0% | 30.0% | View details | |
Georgia Moderate sample | 19 | 14 | 5 | 73.7% | 26.3% | View details |
Total decisions
1321
Grants
1093
Denials
228
Total decisions
298
Grants
232
Denials
66
Total decisions
113
Grants
91
Denials
22
Total decisions
113
Grants
101
Denials
12
Total decisions
86
Grants
39
Denials
47
Total decisions
85
Grants
80
Denials
5
Total decisions
70
Grants
40
Denials
30
Total decisions
67
Grants
59
Denials
8
Total decisions
61
Grants
19
Denials
42
Total decisions
42
Grants
28
Denials
14
Total decisions
39
Grants
35
Denials
4
Total decisions
35
Grants
23
Denials
12
Total decisions
34
Grants
13
Denials
21
Total decisions
28
Grants
10
Denials
18
Total decisions
28
Grants
20
Denials
8
Total decisions
25
Grants
25
Denials
0
Total decisions
25
Grants
8
Denials
17
Total decisions
22
Grants
21
Denials
1
Total decisions
20
Grants
14
Denials
6
Total decisions
19
Grants
14
Denials
5
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.