Niue
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
274
Grants
130
Denials
144
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
27.1%
392 / 1444
Total decisions
1444
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
27.1%
Grants: 392
Denial rate
72.8%
Denials: 1052
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Judge Achtsam was appointed as an Immigration Judge in July 1986. He received a Bachelor of Arts degree from Queens College, City University of New York, in 1973, and a Juris Doctorate from the State University of New York at Buffalo, in 1976. Judge Achtsam worked as an attorney for the Law Offices of Jones and Crane in Weslaco, Texas, from 1984 to 1986. He was employed by the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) in Albany, New York, as an attorney from 1976 to 1981. While employed by the NLRB, from 1976 to 1980, he worked for the Division of Advice Section in Washington, DC. He is a member of both the New York and Texas Bars.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Howard E. Achtsam.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Niue Sufficient sample | 274 | 130 | 144 | 47.4% | 52.6% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 199 | 19 | 180 | 9.5% | 90.5% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 186 | 17 | 169 | 9.1% | 90.9% | View details | |
Mexico Sufficient sample | 120 | 5 | 115 | 4.2% | 95.8% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 108 | 9 | 99 | 8.3% | 91.7% | View details | |
Switzerland Sufficient sample | 88 | 31 | 57 | 35.2% | 64.8% | View details | |
Cuba Sufficient sample | 65 | 35 | 30 | 53.8% | 46.2% | View details | |
Eritrea Sufficient sample | 61 | 49 | 12 | 80.3% | 19.7% | View details | |
India Sufficient sample | 58 | 1 | 57 | 1.7% | 98.3% | View details | |
Somalia Sufficient sample | 43 | 21 | 22 | 48.8% | 51.2% | View details | |
Ethiopia Sufficient sample | 36 | 21 | 15 | 58.3% | 41.7% | View details | |
Jamaica Moderate sample | 14 | 0 | 14 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Bulgaria Moderate sample | 12 | 1 | 11 | 8.3% | 91.7% | View details | |
Colombia Moderate sample | 12 | 2 | 10 | 16.7% | 83.3% | View details | |
Peru Moderate sample | 12 | 3 | 9 | 25.0% | 75.0% | View details | |
Venezuela Moderate sample | 11 | 8 | 3 | 72.7% | 27.3% | View details | |
Nicaragua Small sample | 9 | 4 | 5 | 44.4% | 55.6% | View details | |
Pakistan Small sample | 9 | 1 | 8 | 11.1% | 88.9% | View details | |
Sri Lanka Small sample | 8 | 2 | 6 | 25.0% | 75.0% | View details | |
Haiti Small sample | 7 | 0 | 7 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details |
Total decisions
274
Grants
130
Denials
144
Total decisions
199
Grants
19
Denials
180
Total decisions
186
Grants
17
Denials
169
Total decisions
120
Grants
5
Denials
115
Total decisions
108
Grants
9
Denials
99
Total decisions
88
Grants
31
Denials
57
Total decisions
65
Grants
35
Denials
30
Total decisions
61
Grants
49
Denials
12
Total decisions
58
Grants
1
Denials
57
Total decisions
43
Grants
21
Denials
22
Total decisions
36
Grants
21
Denials
15
Total decisions
14
Grants
0
Denials
14
Total decisions
12
Grants
1
Denials
11
Total decisions
12
Grants
2
Denials
10
Total decisions
12
Grants
3
Denials
9
Total decisions
11
Grants
8
Denials
3
Total decisions
9
Grants
4
Denials
5
Total decisions
9
Grants
1
Denials
8
Total decisions
8
Grants
2
Denials
6
Total decisions
7
Grants
0
Denials
7
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.