Venezuela
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
143
Grants
61
Denials
82
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
25.6%
155 / 605
Total decisions
605
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
25.6%
Grants: 155
Denial rate
74.4%
Denials: 450
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Anna M. Adams was appointed as an Immigration Judge to begin hearing cases in October 2022. Judge Adams earned a Bachelor of Arts in 1992 from the University of Central Florida and a Juris Doctor in 1996 from the Florida State University College of Law. From 2007 to 2022, she served as an assistant chief counsel, Office of the Principal Legal Advisor, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security, in Orlando, Florida. From 2006 to 2007, she was associate attorney with Perla & Associates, PA in Orlando. From 1998 to 2006, she was an associate attorney with Tangel-Rodriguez & Associates in Orlando. From 1996 to 1998, she served as a staff attorney for the Ninth Judicial Circuit in Orlando. Judge Adams is a member of the Florida Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Anna Adams.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Venezuela Sufficient sample | 143 | 61 | 82 | 42.7% | 57.3% | View details | |
Colombia Sufficient sample | 74 | 3 | 71 | 4.1% | 95.9% | View details | |
Cuba Sufficient sample | 67 | 22 | 45 | 32.8% | 67.2% | View details | |
Mexico Sufficient sample | 55 | 0 | 55 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 51 | 0 | 51 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Russia Sufficient sample | 51 | 39 | 12 | 76.5% | 23.5% | View details | |
Niue Sufficient sample | 32 | 11 | 21 | 34.4% | 65.6% | View details | |
Haiti Moderate sample | 25 | 0 | 25 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Guatemala Moderate sample | 24 | 0 | 24 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Brazil Moderate sample | 17 | 0 | 17 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Ecuador Moderate sample | 10 | 0 | 10 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Egypt Small sample | 8 | 8 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Peru Small sample | 8 | 0 | 8 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Spain Small sample | 8 | 0 | 8 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Jamaica Small sample | 6 | 1 | 5 | 16.7% | 83.3% | View details | |
Turkiye Small sample | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Uzbekistan Small sample | 5 | 5 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Vietnam Small sample | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Switzerland Small sample | 3 | 1 | 2 | 33.3% | 66.7% | View details | |
Belize Small sample | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details |
Total decisions
143
Grants
61
Denials
82
Total decisions
74
Grants
3
Denials
71
Total decisions
67
Grants
22
Denials
45
Total decisions
55
Grants
0
Denials
55
Total decisions
51
Grants
0
Denials
51
Total decisions
51
Grants
39
Denials
12
Total decisions
32
Grants
11
Denials
21
Total decisions
25
Grants
0
Denials
25
Total decisions
24
Grants
0
Denials
24
Total decisions
17
Grants
0
Denials
17
Total decisions
10
Grants
0
Denials
10
Total decisions
8
Grants
8
Denials
0
Total decisions
8
Grants
0
Denials
8
Total decisions
8
Grants
0
Denials
8
Total decisions
6
Grants
1
Denials
5
Total decisions
5
Grants
0
Denials
5
Total decisions
5
Grants
5
Denials
0
Total decisions
4
Grants
0
Denials
4
Total decisions
3
Grants
1
Denials
2
Total decisions
2
Grants
2
Denials
0
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.