Brazil
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
96
Grants
22
Denials
74
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
24.6%
104 / 423
Total decisions
423
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
24.6%
Grants: 104
Denial rate
75.4%
Denials: 319
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Richard B. Cato was appointed as an Immigration Judge to begin hearing cases in October 2022. Judge Cato earned a Bachelor of Arts in 1980 from the University of Florida and a Juris Doctor in 1986 from Florida State University College of Law. From 2008 to 2022, he was a hearing officer and administrative judge with the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Office of Hearings and Appeals, National Appeals Division. From 2001 to 2008, he worked for the State of Florida Department of Children and Families in the following roles: staff attorney (2001-2005); deputy chief legal counsel Orange County (2005-2007); and chief legal counsel Polk County (2007- 2008). Also, from 2001 to 2008, he was appointed by the State of Florida Office of the Attorney General to accept periodic case assignments as a board arbitrator for the Florida New Motor Vehicle Arbitration Board. From 1998 to 2001, he was the managing attorney for Greater Orlando Area Legal Services (GOALS). From 1989 to 1998, he was in private practice. From 1988 to 1989, he was an associate attorney with Perry & Lamb, PA. From 1986 to 1988, he was a GOALS staff attorney and office manager. Judge Cato is a member of the Florida Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Richard Cato.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Brazil Sufficient sample | 96 | 22 | 74 | 22.9% | 77.1% | View details | |
Cuba Sufficient sample | 49 | 13 | 36 | 26.5% | 73.5% | View details | |
Venezuela Sufficient sample | 48 | 6 | 42 | 12.5% | 87.5% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 47 | 4 | 43 | 8.5% | 91.5% | View details | |
Colombia Sufficient sample | 43 | 20 | 23 | 46.5% | 53.5% | View details | |
Guatemala Moderate sample | 27 | 2 | 25 | 7.4% | 92.6% | View details | |
Haiti Moderate sample | 19 | 0 | 19 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Mexico Moderate sample | 17 | 2 | 15 | 11.8% | 88.2% | View details | |
Russia Moderate sample | 16 | 7 | 9 | 43.8% | 56.3% | View details | |
Niue Moderate sample | 14 | 0 | 14 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Dominican Republic Small sample | 9 | 6 | 3 | 66.7% | 33.3% | View details | |
Ecuador Small sample | 9 | 7 | 2 | 77.8% | 22.2% | View details | |
Angola Small sample | 7 | 4 | 3 | 57.1% | 42.9% | View details | |
Spain Small sample | 4 | 3 | 1 | 75.0% | 25.0% | View details | |
Peru Small sample | 3 | 2 | 1 | 66.7% | 33.3% | View details | |
Ukraine Small sample | 3 | 2 | 1 | 66.7% | 33.3% | View details | |
Afghanistan Small sample | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Vietnam Small sample | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Belize Small sample | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Bulgaria Small sample | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details |
Total decisions
96
Grants
22
Denials
74
Total decisions
49
Grants
13
Denials
36
Total decisions
48
Grants
6
Denials
42
Total decisions
47
Grants
4
Denials
43
Total decisions
43
Grants
20
Denials
23
Total decisions
27
Grants
2
Denials
25
Total decisions
19
Grants
0
Denials
19
Total decisions
17
Grants
2
Denials
15
Total decisions
16
Grants
7
Denials
9
Total decisions
14
Grants
0
Denials
14
Total decisions
9
Grants
6
Denials
3
Total decisions
9
Grants
7
Denials
2
Total decisions
7
Grants
4
Denials
3
Total decisions
4
Grants
3
Denials
1
Total decisions
3
Grants
2
Denials
1
Total decisions
3
Grants
2
Denials
1
Total decisions
2
Grants
0
Denials
2
Total decisions
2
Grants
1
Denials
1
Total decisions
1
Grants
0
Denials
1
Total decisions
1
Grants
0
Denials
1
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.