Honduras
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
152
Grants
4
Denials
148
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
12.7%
142 / 1120
Total decisions
1120
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
12.7%
Grants: 142
Denial rate
87.3%
Denials: 978
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Former Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch appointed Justin F. Adams to begin hearing cases in April 2017. Judge Adams earned a Bachelor of Science degree in 1999 from the U.S. Air Force Academy and a Juris Doctor in 2004 from Suffolk University Law School. He served as deputy chief counsel for the Office of Chief Counsel, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security from February 2011 to March 2017, and as an assistant chief counsel from 2007 to 2011. From 2004 through 2007, he was an attorney for the U.S. Air Force. Judge Adams is a member of the State Bar of Texas.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Justin Adams.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Honduras Sufficient sample | 152 | 4 | 148 | 2.6% | 97.4% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 130 | 2 | 128 | 1.5% | 98.5% | View details | |
Venezuela Sufficient sample | 127 | 41 | 86 | 32.3% | 67.7% | View details | |
Cuba Sufficient sample | 122 | 8 | 114 | 6.6% | 93.4% | View details | |
Mexico Sufficient sample | 84 | 0 | 84 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Niue Sufficient sample | 83 | 6 | 77 | 7.2% | 92.8% | View details | |
Colombia Sufficient sample | 73 | 0 | 73 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Cameroon Sufficient sample | 58 | 29 | 29 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 53 | 2 | 51 | 3.8% | 96.2% | View details | |
Ecuador Sufficient sample | 32 | 1 | 31 | 3.1% | 96.9% | View details | |
Switzerland Moderate sample | 22 | 2 | 20 | 9.1% | 90.9% | View details | |
Democratic Republic Of Congo Moderate sample | 18 | 3 | 15 | 16.7% | 83.3% | View details | |
Eritrea Moderate sample | 15 | 7 | 8 | 46.7% | 53.3% | View details | |
Peru Moderate sample | 15 | 3 | 12 | 20.0% | 80.0% | View details | |
Romania Moderate sample | 13 | 1 | 12 | 7.7% | 92.3% | View details | |
Nepal Moderate sample | 12 | 6 | 6 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Albania Small sample | 8 | 3 | 5 | 37.5% | 62.5% | View details | |
Angola Small sample | 8 | 2 | 6 | 25.0% | 75.0% | View details | |
Central African Republic Small sample | 8 | 2 | 6 | 25.0% | 75.0% | View details | |
Mali Small sample | 8 | 2 | 6 | 25.0% | 75.0% | View details |
Total decisions
152
Grants
4
Denials
148
Total decisions
130
Grants
2
Denials
128
Total decisions
127
Grants
41
Denials
86
Total decisions
122
Grants
8
Denials
114
Total decisions
84
Grants
0
Denials
84
Total decisions
83
Grants
6
Denials
77
Total decisions
73
Grants
0
Denials
73
Total decisions
58
Grants
29
Denials
29
Total decisions
53
Grants
2
Denials
51
Total decisions
32
Grants
1
Denials
31
Total decisions
22
Grants
2
Denials
20
Total decisions
18
Grants
3
Denials
15
Total decisions
15
Grants
7
Denials
8
Total decisions
15
Grants
3
Denials
12
Total decisions
13
Grants
1
Denials
12
Total decisions
12
Grants
6
Denials
6
Total decisions
8
Grants
3
Denials
5
Total decisions
8
Grants
2
Denials
6
Total decisions
8
Grants
2
Denials
6
Total decisions
8
Grants
2
Denials
6
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.