Honduras
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
277
Grants
27
Denials
250
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
20.1%
218 / 1085
Total decisions
1085
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
20.1%
Grants: 218
Denial rate
79.9%
Denials: 867
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Attorney General Eric Holder appointed Judge Crossan in October 2010. Judge Crossan received a bachelor of arts degree in 1979 and a juris doctorate in 1983, both from the University of Idaho. From 2008 to October 2010, he worked as an assistant chief counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, San Antonio, Texas. From 2000 to 2008, he served in the U.S. Air Force as a military judge in Washington, D.C., and as staff judge advocate in Tucson, Ariz., and San Antonio. Judge Crossan is a member of the Idaho State Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Thomas G. Jr Crossan.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Honduras Sufficient sample | 277 | 27 | 250 | 9.7% | 90.3% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 207 | 25 | 182 | 12.1% | 87.9% | View details | |
Mexico Sufficient sample | 97 | 7 | 90 | 7.2% | 92.8% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 89 | 8 | 81 | 9.0% | 91.0% | View details | |
Cuba Sufficient sample | 78 | 11 | 67 | 14.1% | 85.9% | View details | |
Eritrea Sufficient sample | 42 | 23 | 19 | 54.8% | 45.2% | View details | |
Venezuela Sufficient sample | 34 | 15 | 19 | 44.1% | 55.9% | View details | |
Cameroon Moderate sample | 29 | 20 | 9 | 69.0% | 31.0% | View details | |
Niue Moderate sample | 29 | 9 | 20 | 31.0% | 69.0% | View details | |
Somalia Moderate sample | 15 | 8 | 7 | 53.3% | 46.7% | View details | |
Bulgaria Moderate sample | 14 | 6 | 8 | 42.9% | 57.1% | View details | |
Democratic Republic Of Congo Moderate sample | 14 | 2 | 12 | 14.3% | 85.7% | View details | |
Ethiopia Moderate sample | 14 | 10 | 4 | 71.4% | 28.6% | View details | |
Central African Republic Moderate sample | 13 | 8 | 5 | 61.5% | 38.5% | View details | |
Colombia Moderate sample | 11 | 1 | 10 | 9.1% | 90.9% | View details | |
Switzerland Moderate sample | 10 | 4 | 6 | 40.0% | 60.0% | View details | |
Ecuador Small sample | 9 | 0 | 9 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Sri Lanka Small sample | 9 | 5 | 4 | 55.6% | 44.4% | View details | |
Guinea Small sample | 8 | 6 | 2 | 75.0% | 25.0% | View details | |
India Small sample | 7 | 0 | 7 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details |
Total decisions
277
Grants
27
Denials
250
Total decisions
207
Grants
25
Denials
182
Total decisions
97
Grants
7
Denials
90
Total decisions
89
Grants
8
Denials
81
Total decisions
78
Grants
11
Denials
67
Total decisions
42
Grants
23
Denials
19
Total decisions
34
Grants
15
Denials
19
Total decisions
29
Grants
20
Denials
9
Total decisions
29
Grants
9
Denials
20
Total decisions
15
Grants
8
Denials
7
Total decisions
14
Grants
6
Denials
8
Total decisions
14
Grants
2
Denials
12
Total decisions
14
Grants
10
Denials
4
Total decisions
13
Grants
8
Denials
5
Total decisions
11
Grants
1
Denials
10
Total decisions
10
Grants
4
Denials
6
Total decisions
9
Grants
0
Denials
9
Total decisions
9
Grants
5
Denials
4
Total decisions
8
Grants
6
Denials
2
Total decisions
7
Grants
0
Denials
7
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.