Brazil
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
40
Grants
5
Denials
35
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
57.9%
114 / 197
Total decisions
197
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
57.9%
Grants: 114
Denial rate
42.1%
Denials: 83
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Jenny Vi Beverly was appointed as an immigration judge to begin hearing cases in May 2024. Judge Beverly earned a Bachelor of Arts in 2010 from the University of California, Los Angeles, and a Juris Doctor in 2013 from the University of Maine School of Law. From 2014 to 2024, she was in private practice as an attorney partner from 2014 to 2017 and as principal attorney from 2017 to 2024, representing noncitizens before EOIR and U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Department of Homeland Security. During her time in private practice, she volunteered as pro bono counsel for the Immigrant Legal Advocacy Project in Maine. Judge Beverly is a member of the Maine State Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Jenny Beverly.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Brazil Sufficient sample | 40 | 5 | 35 | 12.5% | 87.5% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 30 | 16 | 14 | 53.3% | 46.7% | View details | |
Angola Moderate sample | 21 | 14 | 7 | 66.7% | 33.3% | View details | |
Spain Moderate sample | 20 | 17 | 3 | 85.0% | 15.0% | View details | |
Democratic Republic Of Congo Moderate sample | 14 | 10 | 4 | 71.4% | 28.6% | View details | |
Venezuela Moderate sample | 11 | 10 | 1 | 90.9% | 9.1% | View details | |
Ecuador Moderate sample | 10 | 2 | 8 | 20.0% | 80.0% | View details | |
Niue Small sample | 8 | 7 | 1 | 87.5% | 12.5% | View details | |
Uganda Small sample | 6 | 6 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Dominican Republic Small sample | 5 | 3 | 2 | 60.0% | 40.0% | View details | |
Honduras Small sample | 5 | 3 | 2 | 60.0% | 40.0% | View details | |
Cameroon Small sample | 4 | 4 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Colombia Small sample | 4 | 4 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Peru Small sample | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Belarus Small sample | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Central African Republic Small sample | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Haiti Small sample | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Tonga Small sample | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Côte d’Ivoire Small sample | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Djibouti Small sample | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details |
Total decisions
40
Grants
5
Denials
35
Total decisions
30
Grants
16
Denials
14
Total decisions
21
Grants
14
Denials
7
Total decisions
20
Grants
17
Denials
3
Total decisions
14
Grants
10
Denials
4
Total decisions
11
Grants
10
Denials
1
Total decisions
10
Grants
2
Denials
8
Total decisions
8
Grants
7
Denials
1
Total decisions
6
Grants
6
Denials
0
Total decisions
5
Grants
3
Denials
2
Total decisions
5
Grants
3
Denials
2
Total decisions
4
Grants
4
Denials
0
Total decisions
4
Grants
4
Denials
0
Total decisions
3
Grants
0
Denials
3
Total decisions
2
Grants
2
Denials
0
Total decisions
2
Grants
2
Denials
0
Total decisions
2
Grants
0
Denials
2
Total decisions
2
Grants
2
Denials
0
Total decisions
1
Grants
0
Denials
1
Total decisions
1
Grants
1
Denials
0
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.