Brazil
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
104
Grants
13
Denials
91
Grant rate: 12.5%Denial rate: 87.5%
Immigration judge
Nina Froes
Community discussion · 0Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
- Status
- active
- Data source
- EOIR Case Data
Grant rate
36.5%
122 / 334
Total decisions
334
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
36.5%
Grants: 122
Denial rate
63.5%
Denials: 212
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
Judge profile
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Nina J. Froes was appointed as an immigration judge to begin hearing cases in May 2024. Judge Froes earned a Bachelor of Arts in 2003 from the University of Massachusetts Dartmouth and a Juris Doctor in 2008 from Roger Williams University School of Law. From 2013 to 2024, she was a solo immigration law practitioner at the Law Office of Nina J. Froes in New Mattapoisett, Massachusetts. From 2012 to 2013, she was a clinical fellow at the Immigration Law Clinic, School of Law, University of Massachusetts Dartmouth. From 2010 to 2011, she was the legal director of the Immigrant Victims Representation Project, Immigration Department, Catholic Social Services of Fall River, Catholic Charities USA, in Fall River, Massachusetts. From 2008 to 2011, she was a fellow in the immigration unit at the Legal Assistance Corporation of Central Massachusetts in Worcester, Massachusetts. Judge Froes is a member of the Massachusetts Bar and the Rhode Island Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Outcome distribution
Grants122 / 334
Denials212 / 334
Other relief0 / 334
Community perspective
Community discussion
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Nina Froes.
0 topics
You can start with these public topics
- Share a public process or preparation experience
- Discuss how to interpret public data
- Ask a question without personal case details
Case details
0 rowsThis table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Case Ratio
-
Distribution
Showing 0 of 0
View by applicant nationality
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Brazil Sufficient sample | 104 | 13 | 91 | 12.5% | 87.5% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 33 | 19 | 14 | 57.6% | 42.4% | View details | |
Angola Moderate sample | 22 | 17 | 5 | 77.3% | 22.7% | View details | |
Ecuador Moderate sample | 20 | 3 | 17 | 15.0% | 85.0% | View details | |
Colombia Moderate sample | 18 | 6 | 12 | 33.3% | 66.7% | View details | |
Democratic Republic Of Congo Moderate sample | 17 | 4 | 13 | 23.5% | 76.5% | View details | |
Honduras Moderate sample | 16 | 6 | 10 | 37.5% | 62.5% | View details | |
India Moderate sample | 14 | 4 | 10 | 28.6% | 71.4% | View details | |
Spain Moderate sample | 13 | 3 | 10 | 23.1% | 76.9% | View details | |
Cameroon Small sample | 9 | 9 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Turkiye Small sample | 9 | 4 | 5 | 44.4% | 55.6% | View details | |
Haiti Small sample | 8 | 2 | 6 | 25.0% | 75.0% | View details | |
Belize Small sample | 6 | 6 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Dominican Republic Small sample | 6 | 1 | 5 | 16.7% | 83.3% | View details | |
Belarus Small sample | 5 | 5 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Russia Small sample | 5 | 5 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Switzerland Small sample | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Singapore Small sample | 3 | 1 | 2 | 33.3% | 66.7% | View details | |
Somalia Small sample | 3 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Rwanda Small sample | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details |
View details
Guatemala
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
33
Grants
19
Denials
14
Grant rate: 57.6%Denial rate: 42.4%
Angola
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
22
Grants
17
Denials
5
Grant rate: 77.3%Denial rate: 22.7%
Ecuador
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
20
Grants
3
Denials
17
Grant rate: 15.0%Denial rate: 85.0%
Colombia
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
18
Grants
6
Denials
12
Grant rate: 33.3%Denial rate: 66.7%
Democratic Republic Of Congo
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
17
Grants
4
Denials
13
Grant rate: 23.5%Denial rate: 76.5%
Honduras
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
16
Grants
6
Denials
10
Grant rate: 37.5%Denial rate: 62.5%
India
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
14
Grants
4
Denials
10
Grant rate: 28.6%Denial rate: 71.4%
Spain
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
13
Grants
3
Denials
10
Grant rate: 23.1%Denial rate: 76.9%
Cameroon
Small sampleTotal decisions
9
Grants
9
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
Turkiye
Small sampleTotal decisions
9
Grants
4
Denials
5
Grant rate: 44.4%Denial rate: 55.6%
Haiti
Small sampleTotal decisions
8
Grants
2
Denials
6
Grant rate: 25.0%Denial rate: 75.0%
Belize
Small sampleTotal decisions
6
Grants
6
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
Dominican Republic
Small sampleTotal decisions
6
Grants
1
Denials
5
Grant rate: 16.7%Denial rate: 83.3%
Belarus
Small sampleTotal decisions
5
Grants
5
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
Russia
Small sampleTotal decisions
5
Grants
5
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
Switzerland
Small sampleTotal decisions
5
Grants
0
Denials
5
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Singapore
Small sampleTotal decisions
3
Grants
1
Denials
2
Grant rate: 33.3%Denial rate: 66.7%
Somalia
Small sampleTotal decisions
3
Grants
3
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
Rwanda
Small sampleTotal decisions
2
Grants
2
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Other judges at the same immigration court
Sameer Ahmed
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 83.7%
- Denial Rate
- 16.3%
Jenny Beverly
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 57.9%
- Denial Rate
- 42.1%
Yul-Mi Cho
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 15.4%
- Denial Rate
- 84.6%
Kerry Doyle
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 0.0%
- Denial Rate
- 0.0%
Luciana Dubuc
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 2.9%
- Denial Rate
- 97.1%
Nancy Griffiths
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 34.4%
- Denial Rate
- 65.6%
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.