Ecuador
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
229
Grants
19
Denials
210
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
19.7%
246 / 1251
Total decisions
1251
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
19.7%
Grants: 246
Denial rate
80.3%
Denials: 1005
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Scott E. Bratton was appointed as an Immigration Judge to begin hearing cases in October 2022. Judge Bratton earned a Bachelor of Science in Business Administration in 1993 from Ohio Northern University and a Juris Doctor in 1997 from the University of Cincinnati College of Law. From 2020 to 2022, he served as a partner at Martin Jolic & Bratton, LLC in Independence, Ohio. From 2004 to 2020, he was a partner at Margaret Wong & Associates LLC, where he was also an associate attorney from 2001 to 2004. From 1997 to 2001, Judge Bratton was in private practice in Cincinnati. Judge Bratton is a member of the Ohio State Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Scott Bratton.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ecuador Sufficient sample | 229 | 19 | 210 | 8.3% | 91.7% | View details | |
Niue Sufficient sample | 144 | 14 | 130 | 9.7% | 90.3% | View details | |
Venezuela Sufficient sample | 137 | 49 | 88 | 35.8% | 64.2% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 106 | 9 | 97 | 8.5% | 91.5% | View details | |
Colombia Sufficient sample | 79 | 6 | 73 | 7.6% | 92.4% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 78 | 4 | 74 | 5.1% | 94.9% | View details | |
India Sufficient sample | 60 | 8 | 52 | 13.3% | 86.7% | View details | |
Peru Sufficient sample | 51 | 4 | 47 | 7.8% | 92.2% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 45 | 9 | 36 | 20.0% | 80.0% | View details | |
Mexico Sufficient sample | 37 | 0 | 37 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Russia Sufficient sample | 37 | 17 | 20 | 45.9% | 54.1% | View details | |
Bulgaria Sufficient sample | 30 | 22 | 8 | 73.3% | 26.7% | View details | |
Nicaragua Moderate sample | 28 | 8 | 20 | 28.6% | 71.4% | View details | |
Switzerland Moderate sample | 24 | 16 | 8 | 66.7% | 33.3% | View details | |
Ghana Moderate sample | 19 | 11 | 8 | 57.9% | 42.1% | View details | |
Haiti Moderate sample | 17 | 0 | 17 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Singapore Moderate sample | 12 | 3 | 9 | 25.0% | 75.0% | View details | |
Mauritania Moderate sample | 11 | 2 | 9 | 18.2% | 81.8% | View details | |
Brazil Moderate sample | 10 | 0 | 10 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Albania Small sample | 9 | 4 | 5 | 44.4% | 55.6% | View details |
Total decisions
229
Grants
19
Denials
210
Total decisions
144
Grants
14
Denials
130
Total decisions
137
Grants
49
Denials
88
Total decisions
106
Grants
9
Denials
97
Total decisions
79
Grants
6
Denials
73
Total decisions
78
Grants
4
Denials
74
Total decisions
60
Grants
8
Denials
52
Total decisions
51
Grants
4
Denials
47
Total decisions
45
Grants
9
Denials
36
Total decisions
37
Grants
0
Denials
37
Total decisions
37
Grants
17
Denials
20
Total decisions
30
Grants
22
Denials
8
Total decisions
28
Grants
8
Denials
20
Total decisions
24
Grants
16
Denials
8
Total decisions
19
Grants
11
Denials
8
Total decisions
17
Grants
0
Denials
17
Total decisions
12
Grants
3
Denials
9
Total decisions
11
Grants
2
Denials
9
Total decisions
10
Grants
0
Denials
10
Total decisions
9
Grants
4
Denials
5
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.