Mexico
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
142
Grants
14
Denials
128
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
26.2%
259 / 987
Total decisions
987
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
26.2%
Grants: 259
Denial rate
73.8%
Denials: 728
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch appointed Valerie A. Burch to begin hearing cases in September 2016. Judge Burch earned a Bachelor of Arts degree in 2000 from the University of Rochester and a Juris Doctor in 2004 from the Penn State Dickinson School of Law. From 2012 to September 2016, she was an attorney for The Shagin Law Group, in Harrisburg, Pa. From 2007 through 2012, she was a staff attorney for the American Civil Liberties Union of Pennsylvania, in Harrisburg, Pa. From 2004 through 2007, she was a managing attorney for the Pennsylvania Immigration Resource Center, in York, Pa. Judge Burch is a member of the Pennsylvania Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Valerie A Burch.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mexico Sufficient sample | 142 | 14 | 128 | 9.9% | 90.1% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 90 | 20 | 70 | 22.2% | 77.8% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 79 | 19 | 60 | 24.1% | 75.9% | View details | |
India Sufficient sample | 72 | 20 | 52 | 27.8% | 72.2% | View details | |
Venezuela Sufficient sample | 71 | 28 | 43 | 39.4% | 60.6% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 67 | 10 | 57 | 14.9% | 85.1% | View details | |
Niue Sufficient sample | 65 | 13 | 52 | 20.0% | 80.0% | View details | |
Nicaragua Sufficient sample | 61 | 9 | 52 | 14.8% | 85.2% | View details | |
Cameroon Sufficient sample | 54 | 38 | 16 | 70.4% | 29.6% | View details | |
Haiti Sufficient sample | 36 | 2 | 34 | 5.6% | 94.4% | View details | |
Russia Sufficient sample | 30 | 17 | 13 | 56.7% | 43.3% | View details | |
Eritrea Moderate sample | 22 | 13 | 9 | 59.1% | 40.9% | View details | |
Colombia Moderate sample | 17 | 3 | 14 | 17.6% | 82.4% | View details | |
Cuba Moderate sample | 17 | 5 | 12 | 29.4% | 70.6% | View details | |
Switzerland Moderate sample | 17 | 6 | 11 | 35.3% | 64.7% | View details | |
Iran Moderate sample | 11 | 9 | 2 | 81.8% | 18.2% | View details | |
Nepal Moderate sample | 10 | 7 | 3 | 70.0% | 30.0% | View details | |
Democratic Republic Of Congo Small sample | 8 | 1 | 7 | 12.5% | 87.5% | View details | |
Mauritania Small sample | 7 | 0 | 7 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Peru Small sample | 7 | 0 | 7 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details |
Total decisions
142
Grants
14
Denials
128
Total decisions
90
Grants
20
Denials
70
Total decisions
79
Grants
19
Denials
60
Total decisions
72
Grants
20
Denials
52
Total decisions
71
Grants
28
Denials
43
Total decisions
67
Grants
10
Denials
57
Total decisions
65
Grants
13
Denials
52
Total decisions
61
Grants
9
Denials
52
Total decisions
54
Grants
38
Denials
16
Total decisions
36
Grants
2
Denials
34
Total decisions
30
Grants
17
Denials
13
Total decisions
22
Grants
13
Denials
9
Total decisions
17
Grants
3
Denials
14
Total decisions
17
Grants
5
Denials
12
Total decisions
17
Grants
6
Denials
11
Total decisions
11
Grants
9
Denials
2
Total decisions
10
Grants
7
Denials
3
Total decisions
8
Grants
1
Denials
7
Total decisions
7
Grants
0
Denials
7
Total decisions
7
Grants
0
Denials
7
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.