Russia
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
117
Grants
71
Denials
46
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
33.3%
243 / 729
Total decisions
729
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
33.3%
Grants: 243
Denial rate
66.7%
Denials: 486
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Antonio Capistrano was appointed as an Immigration Judge to begin hearing cases in December 2022. Judge Capistrano earned a Bachelor of Arts in 2005 from Rutgers University and a Juris Doctor in 2008 from the Temple University Beasley School of Law. From 2020 to 2022, he was the Managing Partner at MC Law Group, LLC, where he focused on immigration law and criminal defense. From 2010 to 2020, he was the senior associate at The Law Offices of Tahir Mella, P.C., where he represented individuals before EOIR and U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Department of Homeland Security. Judge Capistrano is a member of the Pennsylvania Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Antonio Capistrano.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Russia Sufficient sample | 117 | 71 | 46 | 60.7% | 39.3% | View details | |
Brazil Sufficient sample | 101 | 1 | 100 | 1.0% | 99.0% | View details | |
Colombia Sufficient sample | 42 | 5 | 37 | 11.9% | 88.1% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 39 | 4 | 35 | 10.3% | 89.7% | View details | |
Turkiye Sufficient sample | 37 | 13 | 24 | 35.1% | 64.9% | View details | |
Honduras Moderate sample | 27 | 2 | 25 | 7.4% | 92.6% | View details | |
Kyrgyzstan Moderate sample | 25 | 16 | 9 | 64.0% | 36.0% | View details | |
Uzbekistan Moderate sample | 25 | 9 | 16 | 36.0% | 64.0% | View details | |
Spain Moderate sample | 24 | 10 | 14 | 41.7% | 58.3% | View details | |
Mexico Moderate sample | 21 | 0 | 21 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Venezuela Moderate sample | 20 | 7 | 13 | 35.0% | 65.0% | View details | |
Haiti Moderate sample | 19 | 0 | 19 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
India Moderate sample | 19 | 5 | 14 | 26.3% | 73.7% | View details | |
Ghana Moderate sample | 17 | 13 | 4 | 76.5% | 23.5% | View details | |
Mauritania Moderate sample | 15 | 4 | 11 | 26.7% | 73.3% | View details | |
Ecuador Moderate sample | 14 | 0 | 14 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Belize Moderate sample | 13 | 10 | 3 | 76.9% | 23.1% | View details | |
Azerbaijan Moderate sample | 10 | 7 | 3 | 70.0% | 30.0% | View details | |
Türkiye Moderate sample | 10 | 2 | 8 | 20.0% | 80.0% | View details | |
Cameroon Small sample | 8 | 6 | 2 | 75.0% | 25.0% | View details |
Total decisions
117
Grants
71
Denials
46
Total decisions
101
Grants
1
Denials
100
Total decisions
42
Grants
5
Denials
37
Total decisions
39
Grants
4
Denials
35
Total decisions
37
Grants
13
Denials
24
Total decisions
27
Grants
2
Denials
25
Total decisions
25
Grants
16
Denials
9
Total decisions
25
Grants
9
Denials
16
Total decisions
24
Grants
10
Denials
14
Total decisions
21
Grants
0
Denials
21
Total decisions
20
Grants
7
Denials
13
Total decisions
19
Grants
0
Denials
19
Total decisions
19
Grants
5
Denials
14
Total decisions
17
Grants
13
Denials
4
Total decisions
15
Grants
4
Denials
11
Total decisions
14
Grants
0
Denials
14
Total decisions
13
Grants
10
Denials
3
Total decisions
10
Grants
7
Denials
3
Total decisions
10
Grants
2
Denials
8
Total decisions
8
Grants
6
Denials
2
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.