Spain
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
289
Grants
13
Denials
276
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
8.5%
114 / 1338
Total decisions
1338
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
8.5%
Grants: 114
Denial rate
91.5%
Denials: 1224
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Then-Acting Attorney General Matthew Whitaker appointed Shana W. Chen to begin hearingcases in March 2019. Judge Chen earned a Bachelor of Arts in 1998 from the University of California, Berkeley, and a Juris Doctor in 2001 from the Georgetown University Law Center.From 2006 to 2019, Judge Chen served as an assistant U.S. attorney in the District of New Jersey. From 2004 to 2005, she was a judicial law clerk in the Southern District of New York.From 2001 through 2004, Judge Chen worked as a litigation associate at two private law firms in New York City, Mc Dermott, Will & Emery and Curtis, and Mallet-Prevost, Colt & Mosle. Judge Chen is a member of the New Jersey and New York State Bars.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Shana W Chen.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Spain Sufficient sample | 289 | 13 | 276 | 4.5% | 95.5% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 262 | 11 | 251 | 4.2% | 95.8% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 248 | 4 | 244 | 1.6% | 98.4% | View details | |
Ecuador Sufficient sample | 107 | 2 | 105 | 1.9% | 98.1% | View details | |
Brazil Sufficient sample | 63 | 0 | 63 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Peru Sufficient sample | 42 | 0 | 42 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
India Sufficient sample | 41 | 12 | 29 | 29.3% | 70.7% | View details | |
Venezuela Sufficient sample | 41 | 10 | 31 | 24.4% | 75.6% | View details | |
Colombia Sufficient sample | 40 | 0 | 40 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Nicaragua Sufficient sample | 39 | 26 | 13 | 66.7% | 33.3% | View details | |
Mexico Sufficient sample | 30 | 1 | 29 | 3.3% | 96.7% | View details | |
Niue Moderate sample | 19 | 0 | 19 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Turkiye Moderate sample | 15 | 3 | 12 | 20.0% | 80.0% | View details | |
Haiti Moderate sample | 11 | 0 | 11 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Dominican Republic Small sample | 8 | 0 | 8 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Egypt Small sample | 8 | 5 | 3 | 62.5% | 37.5% | View details | |
Ghana Small sample | 8 | 4 | 4 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Georgia Small sample | 7 | 1 | 6 | 14.3% | 85.7% | View details | |
Russia Small sample | 6 | 3 | 3 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Cuba Small sample | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details |
Total decisions
289
Grants
13
Denials
276
Total decisions
262
Grants
11
Denials
251
Total decisions
248
Grants
4
Denials
244
Total decisions
107
Grants
2
Denials
105
Total decisions
63
Grants
0
Denials
63
Total decisions
42
Grants
0
Denials
42
Total decisions
41
Grants
12
Denials
29
Total decisions
41
Grants
10
Denials
31
Total decisions
40
Grants
0
Denials
40
Total decisions
39
Grants
26
Denials
13
Total decisions
30
Grants
1
Denials
29
Total decisions
19
Grants
0
Denials
19
Total decisions
15
Grants
3
Denials
12
Total decisions
11
Grants
0
Denials
11
Total decisions
8
Grants
0
Denials
8
Total decisions
8
Grants
5
Denials
3
Total decisions
8
Grants
4
Denials
4
Total decisions
7
Grants
1
Denials
6
Total decisions
6
Grants
3
Denials
3
Total decisions
5
Grants
0
Denials
5
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.