Spain
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
105
Grants
7
Denials
98
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
20.9%
131 / 626
Total decisions
626
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
20.9%
Grants: 131
Denial rate
79.1%
Denials: 495
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Attorney General Jeff Sessions appointed David Cheng to begin hearing cases in July 2017. Judge Cheng earned a Bachelor of Arts degree in 1992 from the State University of New York at Albany and a Juris Doctor in 1997 from St. John’s University School of Law. From 2002 to 2017, he served as a senior attorney for the Office of Chief Counsel, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security, in Newark, N.J. From 2000 to 2002, he served as an administrative law judge for the New York City Department of Finance. From 1997 to 2000, he was a general partner at Cheng and Cheng P.C., in New York, N.Y. Judge Cheng is a member of the New York State Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to David Cheng.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Spain Sufficient sample | 105 | 7 | 98 | 6.7% | 93.3% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 84 | 3 | 81 | 3.6% | 96.4% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 72 | 7 | 65 | 9.7% | 90.3% | View details | |
Colombia Sufficient sample | 44 | 11 | 33 | 25.0% | 75.0% | View details | |
Ecuador Sufficient sample | 42 | 6 | 36 | 14.3% | 85.7% | View details | |
Nicaragua Sufficient sample | 36 | 19 | 17 | 52.8% | 47.2% | View details | |
Peru Sufficient sample | 35 | 5 | 30 | 14.3% | 85.7% | View details | |
Mexico Moderate sample | 26 | 1 | 25 | 3.8% | 96.2% | View details | |
India Moderate sample | 23 | 10 | 13 | 43.5% | 56.5% | View details | |
Turkiye Moderate sample | 21 | 7 | 14 | 33.3% | 66.7% | View details | |
Brazil Moderate sample | 15 | 2 | 13 | 13.3% | 86.7% | View details | |
Dominican Republic Moderate sample | 15 | 4 | 11 | 26.7% | 73.3% | View details | |
Switzerland Moderate sample | 10 | 7 | 3 | 70.0% | 30.0% | View details | |
Egypt Small sample | 9 | 8 | 1 | 88.9% | 11.1% | View details | |
Haiti Small sample | 9 | 0 | 9 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Niue Small sample | 8 | 2 | 6 | 25.0% | 75.0% | View details | |
Venezuela Small sample | 8 | 4 | 4 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
St. Pierre & Miquelon Small sample | 6 | 0 | 6 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Ghana Small sample | 5 | 1 | 4 | 20.0% | 80.0% | View details | |
Pakistan Small sample | 5 | 2 | 3 | 40.0% | 60.0% | View details |
Total decisions
105
Grants
7
Denials
98
Total decisions
84
Grants
3
Denials
81
Total decisions
72
Grants
7
Denials
65
Total decisions
44
Grants
11
Denials
33
Total decisions
42
Grants
6
Denials
36
Total decisions
36
Grants
19
Denials
17
Total decisions
35
Grants
5
Denials
30
Total decisions
26
Grants
1
Denials
25
Total decisions
23
Grants
10
Denials
13
Total decisions
21
Grants
7
Denials
14
Total decisions
15
Grants
2
Denials
13
Total decisions
15
Grants
4
Denials
11
Total decisions
10
Grants
7
Denials
3
Total decisions
9
Grants
8
Denials
1
Total decisions
9
Grants
0
Denials
9
Total decisions
8
Grants
2
Denials
6
Total decisions
8
Grants
4
Denials
4
Total decisions
6
Grants
0
Denials
6
Total decisions
5
Grants
1
Denials
4
Total decisions
5
Grants
2
Denials
3
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.