Honduras
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
229
Grants
18
Denials
211
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
12.8%
164 / 1278
Total decisions
1278
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
12.8%
Grants: 164
Denial rate
87.2%
Denials: 1114
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Attorney General Jeff Sessions appointed Scott D. Criss to begin hearing cases in July 2017. Judge Criss earned a Bachelor of Arts degree in 2002 from the California State University at Long Beach and a Juris Doctor in 2005 from The John Marshall Law School. From 2008 to 2017, he served as an assistant chief counsel for the Office of Chief Counsel, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security, in Charlotte, N.C. From 2006 to 2008, he served as an assistant state’s attorney for the Criminal Traffic Division, Cook County State’s Attorney’s Office, in Chicago, Ill. From 2004 to 2005, he served as an assistant state’s attorney for the Criminal Appellate Division, Cook County State’s Attorney’s Office. Judge Criss is a member of the Illinois State Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Scott D Criss.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Honduras Sufficient sample | 229 | 18 | 211 | 7.9% | 92.1% | View details | |
Mexico Sufficient sample | 147 | 2 | 145 | 1.4% | 98.6% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 116 | 8 | 108 | 6.9% | 93.1% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 102 | 7 | 95 | 6.9% | 93.1% | View details | |
Colombia Sufficient sample | 69 | 2 | 67 | 2.9% | 97.1% | View details | |
Venezuela Sufficient sample | 61 | 16 | 45 | 26.2% | 73.8% | View details | |
India Sufficient sample | 58 | 3 | 55 | 5.2% | 94.8% | View details | |
Niue Sufficient sample | 54 | 17 | 37 | 31.5% | 68.5% | View details | |
Bulgaria Sufficient sample | 51 | 2 | 49 | 3.9% | 96.1% | View details | |
Cuba Sufficient sample | 49 | 14 | 35 | 28.6% | 71.4% | View details | |
Nepal Sufficient sample | 45 | 1 | 44 | 2.2% | 97.8% | View details | |
Switzerland Sufficient sample | 44 | 10 | 34 | 22.7% | 77.3% | View details | |
Cameroon Sufficient sample | 30 | 12 | 18 | 40.0% | 60.0% | View details | |
Brazil Moderate sample | 24 | 5 | 19 | 20.8% | 79.2% | View details | |
Eritrea Moderate sample | 23 | 9 | 14 | 39.1% | 60.9% | View details | |
Sri Lanka Moderate sample | 19 | 3 | 16 | 15.8% | 84.2% | View details | |
Russia Moderate sample | 14 | 3 | 11 | 21.4% | 78.6% | View details | |
Ecuador Moderate sample | 13 | 0 | 13 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Peru Moderate sample | 13 | 0 | 13 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Romania Small sample | 9 | 0 | 9 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details |
Total decisions
229
Grants
18
Denials
211
Total decisions
147
Grants
2
Denials
145
Total decisions
116
Grants
8
Denials
108
Total decisions
102
Grants
7
Denials
95
Total decisions
69
Grants
2
Denials
67
Total decisions
61
Grants
16
Denials
45
Total decisions
58
Grants
3
Denials
55
Total decisions
54
Grants
17
Denials
37
Total decisions
51
Grants
2
Denials
49
Total decisions
49
Grants
14
Denials
35
Total decisions
45
Grants
1
Denials
44
Total decisions
44
Grants
10
Denials
34
Total decisions
30
Grants
12
Denials
18
Total decisions
24
Grants
5
Denials
19
Total decisions
23
Grants
9
Denials
14
Total decisions
19
Grants
3
Denials
16
Total decisions
14
Grants
3
Denials
11
Total decisions
13
Grants
0
Denials
13
Total decisions
13
Grants
0
Denials
13
Total decisions
9
Grants
0
Denials
9
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.