Rodger C Harris
Court
Total Decisions
2023
Asylum Grant Rate
22.9%
Denials
77.1%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
The sample size is relatively substantial, but it still cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Data updated: Aug 8, 2026
← All courtsactive active active active active active active active active active active active active active active active active active active active active active active
Immigration Court
Chl Immigration Court
Community discussion · 024 Judges indexed · NC
- State
- Immigration Court, NC
- Data Source
- EOIR Case Data
Average Asylum Grant Rate
10.4%
1285 / 12387
Average Asylum Grant Rate
10.4%
Asylum grants
1285
Denials
11102
Judges indexed
24
This page is based on public data currently organized by this site and may not represent complete real-time EOIR data.
Community perspective
Community discussion
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Chl Immigration Court.
0 topics
You can start with these public topics
- Share a public process or preparation experience
- Discuss how to interpret public data
- Ask a question without personal case details
Judges indexed for this court
Browse public data on U.S. immigration judges, including assigned court, asylum grant rate, denial rate, total decisions, and data sources.
active
Maria Lopez-Enriquez
Court
Total Decisions
1314
Asylum Grant Rate
13.0%
Denials
87.0%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
The sample size is relatively substantial, but it still cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Data updated: Aug 8, 2026
Lisa A. de Cardona
Court
Total Decisions
1289
Asylum Grant Rate
23.7%
Denials
76.3%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
The sample size is relatively substantial, but it still cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Data updated: Aug 8, 2026
Scott D Criss
Court
Total Decisions
1278
Asylum Grant Rate
12.8%
Denials
87.2%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
The sample size is relatively substantial, but it still cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Data updated: Aug 8, 2026
Nicholas A Martz
Court
Total Decisions
1127
Asylum Grant Rate
14.3%
Denials
85.7%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
The sample size is relatively substantial, but it still cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Data updated: Aug 8, 2026
Barry J. Pettinato
Court
Total Decisions
1074
Asylum Grant Rate
11.6%
Denials
88.5%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
The sample size is relatively substantial, but it still cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Data updated: Aug 8, 2026
Jeffery R Nance
Court
Total Decisions
1043
Asylum Grant Rate
10.0%
Denials
90.0%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
The sample size is relatively substantial, but it still cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Data updated: Aug 8, 2026
V. Stuart Couch
Court
Total Decisions
935
Asylum Grant Rate
10.9%
Denials
89.1%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
The sample size is relatively substantial, but it still cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Data updated: Aug 8, 2026
George James JR. Ward
Court
Total Decisions
918
Asylum Grant Rate
17.5%
Denials
82.5%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
The sample size is relatively substantial, but it still cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Data updated: Aug 8, 2026
George W Riggs
Court
Total Decisions
740
Asylum Grant Rate
5.1%
Denials
94.9%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
The sample size is relatively substantial, but it still cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Data updated: Aug 8, 2026
Jeb Terrien
Court
Total Decisions
721
Asylum Grant Rate
18.2%
Denials
81.8%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
The sample size is relatively substantial, but it still cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Data updated: Aug 8, 2026
Robert M Lewandowski
Court
Total Decisions
593
Asylum Grant Rate
8.9%
Denials
91.1%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
The sample size is relatively substantial, but it still cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Data updated: Aug 8, 2026
Zol Rainey
Court
Total Decisions
584
Asylum Grant Rate
9.3%
Denials
90.8%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
The sample size is relatively substantial, but it still cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Data updated: Aug 8, 2026
David White
Court
Total Decisions
526
Asylum Grant Rate
3.4%
Denials
96.6%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
The sample size is relatively substantial, but it still cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Data updated: Aug 8, 2026
Ellen Karesh
Court
Total Decisions
509
Asylum Grant Rate
13.2%
Denials
86.8%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
The sample size is relatively substantial, but it still cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Data updated: Aug 8, 2026
Derek Julius
Court
Total Decisions
460
Asylum Grant Rate
14.8%
Denials
85.2%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
The sample size is relatively substantial, but it still cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Data updated: Aug 8, 2026
Stephen Stewart
Court
Total Decisions
441
Asylum Grant Rate
5.4%
Denials
94.6%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
The sample size is relatively substantial, but it still cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Data updated: Aug 8, 2026
Charles N Purnell
Court
Total Decisions
406
Asylum Grant Rate
3.0%
Denials
97.0%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
The sample size is relatively substantial, but it still cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Data updated: Aug 8, 2026
James C. Graulich
Court
Total Decisions
381
Asylum Grant Rate
10.0%
Denials
90.0%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
The sample size is relatively substantial, but it still cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Data updated: Aug 8, 2026
Abby Anna. Batko-Taylor
Court
Total Decisions
207
Asylum Grant Rate
49.8%
Denials
50.2%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
The sample size is relatively substantial, but it still cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Data updated: Aug 8, 2026
Jennifer Kerby
Court
Total Decisions
133
Asylum Grant Rate
18.1%
Denials
82.0%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
The sample size is relatively substantial, but it still cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Data updated: Aug 8, 2026
Vimala S. Mangoli
Court
Total Decisions
97
Asylum Grant Rate
7.2%
Denials
92.8%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
The sample size is relatively substantial, but it still cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Data updated: Aug 8, 2026
Chadwick Dotson
Court
Total Decisions
69
Asylum Grant Rate
18.8%
Denials
81.2%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
The sample size is relatively substantial, but it still cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Data updated: Aug 8, 2026
Steven J. Phillips
Court
Total Decisions
1
Asylum Grant Rate
0.0%
Denials
100.0%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
The sample size is small, so the statistic has limited reference value.
Data updated: Aug 8, 2026
Asylum Grant Rate · Nationalities
| Nationalities | Asylum Grant Rate | Asylum grants | Denials | Total Decisions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Honduras | 5.8% | 184 | 2992 | 3176 |
| Mexico | 2.6% | 46 | 1747 | 1793 |
| Spain | 8.8% | 140 | 1445 | 1585 |
| Guatemala | 6.4% | 93 | 1356 | 1449 |
| Venezuela | 22.9% | 193 | 648 | 841 |
| Brazil | 1.8% | 12 | 647 | 659 |
| Colombia | 7.7% | 50 | 596 | 646 |
| Niue | 13.0% | 52 | 348 | 400 |
| Russia | 58.9% | 119 | 83 | 202 |
| Switzerland | 17.1% | 32 | 155 | 187 |
| Haiti | 5.5% | 7 | 121 | 128 |
| Peru | 0.0% | 0 | 112 | 112 |
| Ecuador | 8.2% | 8 | 89 | 97 |
| Singapore | 5.3% | 5 | 90 | 95 |
| Cuba | 11.4% | 10 | 78 | 88 |
| India | 14.0% | 12 | 74 | 86 |
| Egypt | 79.0% | 49 | 13 | 62 |
| Central African Republic | 27.5% | 11 | 29 | 40 |
| Nicaragua | 44.7% | 17 | 21 | 38 |
| Vietnam | 31.4% | 11 | 24 | 35 |
| Moldova | 29.6% | 8 | 19 | 27 |
| Democratic Republic Of Congo | 34.6% | 9 | 17 | 26 |
| Iraq | 60.0% | 15 | 10 | 25 |
| Romania | 4.2% | 1 | 23 | 24 |
| Ethiopia | 82.6% | 19 | 4 | 23 |
| Afghanistan | 40.0% | 8 | 12 | 20 |
| Zimbabwe | 45.0% | 9 | 11 | 20 |
| Belize | 83.3% | 15 | 3 | 18 |
| Gabon | 33.3% | 6 | 12 | 18 |
| Kenya | 11.1% | 2 | 16 | 18 |
| Pakistan | 27.8% | 5 | 13 | 18 |
| Ivory Coast (Cote D'Ivoire) | 29.4% | 5 | 12 | 17 |
| Turkiye | 17.6% | 3 | 14 | 17 |
| Cameroon | 50.0% | 8 | 8 | 16 |
| Côte d’Ivoire | 0.0% | 0 | 16 | 16 |
| Ghana | 25.0% | 4 | 12 | 16 |
| Angola | 20.0% | 3 | 12 | 15 |
| Guinea | 40.0% | 6 | 9 | 15 |
| Russia | 53.3% | 8 | 7 | 15 |
| Mali | 38.5% | 5 | 8 | 13 |
| Dominican Republic | 0.0% | 0 | 12 | 12 |
| Former Countries | 75.0% | 9 | 3 | 12 |
| Indonesia | 33.3% | 4 | 8 | 12 |
| Syria | 58.3% | 7 | 5 | 12 |
| Ukraine | 58.3% | 7 | 5 | 12 |
| Rwanda | 63.6% | 7 | 4 | 11 |
| Mauritania | 20.0% | 2 | 8 | 10 |
| Iran | 77.8% | 7 | 2 | 9 |
| Tonga | 77.8% | 7 | 2 | 9 |
| Iceland | 0.0% | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| St. Barthélemy | 14.3% | 1 | 6 | 7 |
| Bahamas | 71.4% | 5 | 2 | 7 |
| Eritrea | 100.0% | 7 | 0 | 7 |
| Holland | 0.0% | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| Kazakhstan | 14.3% | 1 | 6 | 7 |
| Nepal | 0.0% | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| Yemen | 57.1% | 4 | 3 | 7 |
| Serbia | 0.0% | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Jamaica | 33.3% | 2 | 4 | 6 |
| Azerbaijan | 80.0% | 4 | 1 | 5 |
| Bulgaria | 0.0% | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Georgia | 0.0% | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Namibia | 0.0% | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Pitcairn Islands | 60.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 |
| Uzbekistan | 0.0% | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Armenia | 25.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Brunei | 25.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Bolivia | 25.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Bermuda | 75.0% | 3 | 1 | 4 |
| Jordan | 0.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Liechtenstein | 25.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Nigeria | 0.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| St. Pierre & Miquelon | 50.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 |
| Philippines | 0.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Sierra Leone | 25.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Argentina | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Central African Republic | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Lebanon | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| South Africa | 33.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Uganda | 33.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Albania | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Guadeloupe | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Hungary | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Kyrgyzstan | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Kuwait | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Lithuania | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| South Korea | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| United Kingdom | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Uruguay | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Congo - Brazzaville | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Bahrain | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Burundi | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Belarus | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Djibouti | 100.0% | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Dominican Republic | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Former Countries | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Former Countries | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Greece | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Laos | 100.0% | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Myanmar (Burma) | 100.0% | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Data Source · Disclaimer
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.