Niue
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
34
Grants
2
Denials
32
Grant rate: 5.9%Denial rate: 94.1%
Immigration judge
Robert Driscoll
Community discussion · 0Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
- Status
- active
- Data source
- EOIR Case Data
Grant rate
16.9%
50 / 295
Total decisions
295
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
16.9%
Grants: 50
Denial rate
83.0%
Denials: 245
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
Judge profile
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Attorney General William P. Barr appointed Robert P. Driscoll as an Immigration Judge in October 2020. Judge Driscoll earned a Bachelor of Science in 1984 from The Ohio State University and a Juris Doctor in 1993 from the Capital University Law School. From 1998 to 2020, he served as an assistant attorney for the Athens County Prosecuting Attorney’s Office, in Athens, Ohio. From 1993 to 1998, he was in private practice, in Columbus, Ohio. Judge Driscollis a member of the Ohio State Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Outcome distribution
Grants50 / 295
Denials245 / 295
Other relief0 / 295
Community perspective
Community discussion
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Robert Driscoll.
0 topics
You can start with these public topics
- Share a public process or preparation experience
- Discuss how to interpret public data
- Ask a question without personal case details
Case details
0 rowsThis table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Case Ratio
-
Distribution
Showing 0 of 0
View by applicant nationality
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Niue Sufficient sample | 34 | 2 | 32 | 5.9% | 94.1% | View details | |
Venezuela Moderate sample | 22 | 2 | 20 | 9.1% | 90.9% | View details | |
Dominican Republic Moderate sample | 15 | 0 | 15 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Guatemala Moderate sample | 15 | 0 | 15 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Honduras Moderate sample | 15 | 1 | 14 | 6.7% | 93.3% | View details | |
Mexico Moderate sample | 14 | 0 | 14 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Bulgaria Moderate sample | 11 | 2 | 9 | 18.2% | 81.8% | View details | |
Russia Moderate sample | 11 | 6 | 5 | 54.5% | 45.5% | View details | |
Jamaica Moderate sample | 10 | 0 | 10 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Colombia Small sample | 9 | 0 | 9 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Peru Small sample | 9 | 0 | 9 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Turkiye Small sample | 9 | 3 | 6 | 33.3% | 66.7% | View details | |
Cuba Small sample | 8 | 4 | 4 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Spain Small sample | 8 | 0 | 8 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Belize Small sample | 7 | 3 | 4 | 42.9% | 57.1% | View details | |
Haiti Small sample | 7 | 0 | 7 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Iraq Small sample | 7 | 3 | 4 | 42.9% | 57.1% | View details | |
Ecuador Small sample | 6 | 1 | 5 | 16.7% | 83.3% | View details | |
India Small sample | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Nicaragua Small sample | 5 | 2 | 3 | 40.0% | 60.0% | View details |
View details
Venezuela
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
22
Grants
2
Denials
20
Grant rate: 9.1%Denial rate: 90.9%
Dominican Republic
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
15
Grants
0
Denials
15
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Guatemala
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
15
Grants
0
Denials
15
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Honduras
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
15
Grants
1
Denials
14
Grant rate: 6.7%Denial rate: 93.3%
Mexico
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
14
Grants
0
Denials
14
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Bulgaria
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
11
Grants
2
Denials
9
Grant rate: 18.2%Denial rate: 81.8%
Russia
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
11
Grants
6
Denials
5
Grant rate: 54.5%Denial rate: 45.5%
Jamaica
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
10
Grants
0
Denials
10
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Colombia
Small sampleTotal decisions
9
Grants
0
Denials
9
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Peru
Small sampleTotal decisions
9
Grants
0
Denials
9
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Turkiye
Small sampleTotal decisions
9
Grants
3
Denials
6
Grant rate: 33.3%Denial rate: 66.7%
Cuba
Small sampleTotal decisions
8
Grants
4
Denials
4
Grant rate: 50.0%Denial rate: 50.0%
Spain
Small sampleTotal decisions
8
Grants
0
Denials
8
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Belize
Small sampleTotal decisions
7
Grants
3
Denials
4
Grant rate: 42.9%Denial rate: 57.1%
Haiti
Small sampleTotal decisions
7
Grants
0
Denials
7
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Iraq
Small sampleTotal decisions
7
Grants
3
Denials
4
Grant rate: 42.9%Denial rate: 57.1%
Ecuador
Small sampleTotal decisions
6
Grants
1
Denials
5
Grant rate: 16.7%Denial rate: 83.3%
India
Small sampleTotal decisions
5
Grants
0
Denials
5
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Nicaragua
Small sampleTotal decisions
5
Grants
2
Denials
3
Grant rate: 40.0%Denial rate: 60.0%
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Other judges at the same immigration court
Susan F Aikman
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 8.5%
- Denial Rate
- 91.5%
Brian Counihan
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 9.2%
- Denial Rate
- 90.8%
Joy A. Merriman
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 22.2%
- Denial Rate
- 77.8%
John B. Reid
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 13.4%
- Denial Rate
- 86.6%
Eric Schultz
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 7.1%
- Denial Rate
- 92.9%
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.