Venezuela
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
144
Grants
15
Denials
129
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
5.3%
43 / 814
Total decisions
814
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
5.3%
Grants: 43
Denial rate
94.7%
Denials: 771
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Attorney General William P. Barr appointed Ryan A. Fisher as an immigration judge in March 2020. Judge Fisher earned a Bachelor of Science in 2006 from the Georgia Institute of Technology and a Juris Doctor in 2010 from the University of Georgia School of Law. From 2016 to 2020, he served as an assistant district attorney for the Gwinnett County District Attorney’s Office, in Lawrenceville, Georgia. From 2012 to 2016, he served as an assistantsolicitor general for the Gwinnett County Solicitor General’s Office, in Lawrenceville, Georgia.From 2010 to 2012, he was an associate attorney with Thompson, Sweeny, Kinsinger, & Pereira PC, in Lawrenceville, Georgia. Judge Fisher is a member of the Georgia State Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Ryan Fisher.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Venezuela Sufficient sample | 144 | 15 | 129 | 10.4% | 89.6% | View details | |
Mexico Sufficient sample | 140 | 4 | 136 | 2.9% | 97.1% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 115 | 0 | 115 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 79 | 1 | 78 | 1.3% | 98.7% | View details | |
Niue Sufficient sample | 68 | 4 | 64 | 5.9% | 94.1% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 65 | 1 | 64 | 1.5% | 98.5% | View details | |
Colombia Sufficient sample | 60 | 3 | 57 | 5.0% | 95.0% | View details | |
India Moderate sample | 26 | 1 | 25 | 3.8% | 96.2% | View details | |
Peru Moderate sample | 26 | 0 | 26 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Ecuador Moderate sample | 11 | 0 | 11 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Angola Small sample | 8 | 0 | 8 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Vietnam Small sample | 7 | 0 | 7 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Cuba Small sample | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Haiti Small sample | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Switzerland Small sample | 5 | 2 | 3 | 40.0% | 60.0% | View details | |
Brazil Small sample | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Ghana Small sample | 4 | 2 | 2 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Guinea Small sample | 4 | 1 | 3 | 25.0% | 75.0% | View details | |
Mauritania Small sample | 4 | 1 | 3 | 25.0% | 75.0% | View details | |
Afghanistan Small sample | 3 | 2 | 1 | 66.7% | 33.3% | View details |
Total decisions
144
Grants
15
Denials
129
Total decisions
140
Grants
4
Denials
136
Total decisions
115
Grants
0
Denials
115
Total decisions
79
Grants
1
Denials
78
Total decisions
68
Grants
4
Denials
64
Total decisions
65
Grants
1
Denials
64
Total decisions
60
Grants
3
Denials
57
Total decisions
26
Grants
1
Denials
25
Total decisions
26
Grants
0
Denials
26
Total decisions
11
Grants
0
Denials
11
Total decisions
8
Grants
0
Denials
8
Total decisions
7
Grants
0
Denials
7
Total decisions
5
Grants
0
Denials
5
Total decisions
5
Grants
0
Denials
5
Total decisions
5
Grants
2
Denials
3
Total decisions
4
Grants
0
Denials
4
Total decisions
4
Grants
2
Denials
2
Total decisions
4
Grants
1
Denials
3
Total decisions
4
Grants
1
Denials
3
Total decisions
3
Grants
2
Denials
1
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.