Mexico
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
384
Grants
25
Denials
359
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
33.5%
444 / 1327
Total decisions
1327
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
33.5%
Grants: 444
Denial rate
66.5%
Denials: 883
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Judge Fitting was appointed as an immigration judge in March 2008. She received a bachelor of arts degree in 1986 from the University of Idaho and a juris doctorate in 1989 from the University of Idaho, College of Law. From 2003 to March 2008, Judge Fitting served as assistant chief counsel, ICE, DHS, in Seattle. From 1990 to 2003, Judge Fitting was an assistant district counsel with the former INS, after entering on duty through the Attorney General's Honors Program. She is a member of the Washington and Idaho bars.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Tammy L Fitting.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mexico Sufficient sample | 384 | 25 | 359 | 6.5% | 93.5% | View details | |
Cameroon Sufficient sample | 89 | 61 | 28 | 68.5% | 31.5% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 79 | 11 | 68 | 13.9% | 86.1% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 69 | 19 | 50 | 27.5% | 72.5% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 66 | 10 | 56 | 15.2% | 84.8% | View details | |
Somalia Sufficient sample | 52 | 40 | 12 | 76.9% | 23.1% | View details | |
Switzerland Sufficient sample | 42 | 27 | 15 | 64.3% | 35.7% | View details | |
Russia Sufficient sample | 34 | 22 | 12 | 64.7% | 35.3% | View details | |
India Sufficient sample | 33 | 15 | 18 | 45.5% | 54.5% | View details | |
Cuba Moderate sample | 29 | 21 | 8 | 72.4% | 27.6% | View details | |
Ethiopia Moderate sample | 29 | 12 | 17 | 41.4% | 58.6% | View details | |
Venezuela Moderate sample | 28 | 21 | 7 | 75.0% | 25.0% | View details | |
Niue Moderate sample | 26 | 14 | 12 | 53.8% | 46.2% | View details | |
Colombia Moderate sample | 25 | 9 | 16 | 36.0% | 64.0% | View details | |
Ghana Moderate sample | 24 | 19 | 5 | 79.2% | 20.8% | View details | |
Ukraine Moderate sample | 23 | 0 | 23 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Haiti Moderate sample | 20 | 5 | 15 | 25.0% | 75.0% | View details | |
Afghanistan Moderate sample | 19 | 15 | 4 | 78.9% | 21.1% | View details | |
Eritrea Moderate sample | 17 | 14 | 3 | 82.4% | 17.6% | View details | |
Peru Moderate sample | 12 | 5 | 7 | 41.7% | 58.3% | View details |
Total decisions
384
Grants
25
Denials
359
Total decisions
89
Grants
61
Denials
28
Total decisions
79
Grants
11
Denials
68
Total decisions
69
Grants
19
Denials
50
Total decisions
66
Grants
10
Denials
56
Total decisions
52
Grants
40
Denials
12
Total decisions
42
Grants
27
Denials
15
Total decisions
34
Grants
22
Denials
12
Total decisions
33
Grants
15
Denials
18
Total decisions
29
Grants
21
Denials
8
Total decisions
29
Grants
12
Denials
17
Total decisions
28
Grants
21
Denials
7
Total decisions
26
Grants
14
Denials
12
Total decisions
25
Grants
9
Denials
16
Total decisions
24
Grants
19
Denials
5
Total decisions
23
Grants
0
Denials
23
Total decisions
20
Grants
5
Denials
15
Total decisions
19
Grants
15
Denials
4
Total decisions
17
Grants
14
Denials
3
Total decisions
12
Grants
5
Denials
7
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.