Honduras
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
63
Grants
0
Denials
63
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
0.6%
2 / 329
Total decisions
329
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
0.6%
Grants: 2
Denial rate
99.4%
Denials: 327
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Danielle H. Garten was appointed as an Immigration Judge to begin hearing cases in December 2022. Judge Garten earned a Bachelor of Arts in 2002 from Quinnipiac University and a Juris Doctor in 2005 from Touro College-Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center. From 2016 to 2022, she served as an assistant chief counsel, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security, in El Paso, Texas. During that time, she served as a special assistant U.S. attorney at the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Western District of Texas-El Paso Division. From 2011 to 2016, she was an associate attorney at Marks, O’Neill, O’Brien, Doherty & Kelly, P.C. in New York. From 2009 to 2011, she served as an information, review, and release analyst at the Central Intelligence Agency in Langley, Virginia. From 2008 to 2009, she was an associate attorney at Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry, LLP in New York. From 2006 to 2008, she was an associate attorney at Subin Associates LLP in New York. Judge Garten is a member of the State of Connecticut Bar and New York State Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Danielle H Garten.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Honduras Sufficient sample | 63 | 0 | 63 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Venezuela Sufficient sample | 60 | 0 | 60 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Mexico Sufficient sample | 35 | 0 | 35 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Colombia Sufficient sample | 32 | 0 | 32 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Cuba Moderate sample | 26 | 1 | 25 | 3.8% | 96.2% | View details | |
Spain Moderate sample | 23 | 0 | 23 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Guatemala Moderate sample | 21 | 0 | 21 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Niue Moderate sample | 11 | 0 | 11 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
India Small sample | 9 | 0 | 9 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Turkiye Small sample | 7 | 0 | 7 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Switzerland Small sample | 6 | 0 | 6 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Pakistan Small sample | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Afghanistan Small sample | 4 | 1 | 3 | 25.0% | 75.0% | View details | |
Cameroon Small sample | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Ecuador Small sample | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Armenia Small sample | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Brazil Small sample | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Dominican Republic Small sample | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Peru Small sample | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Angola Small sample | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details |
Total decisions
63
Grants
0
Denials
63
Total decisions
60
Grants
0
Denials
60
Total decisions
35
Grants
0
Denials
35
Total decisions
32
Grants
0
Denials
32
Total decisions
26
Grants
1
Denials
25
Total decisions
23
Grants
0
Denials
23
Total decisions
21
Grants
0
Denials
21
Total decisions
11
Grants
0
Denials
11
Total decisions
9
Grants
0
Denials
9
Total decisions
7
Grants
0
Denials
7
Total decisions
6
Grants
0
Denials
6
Total decisions
5
Grants
0
Denials
5
Total decisions
4
Grants
1
Denials
3
Total decisions
4
Grants
0
Denials
4
Total decisions
4
Grants
0
Denials
4
Total decisions
3
Grants
0
Denials
3
Total decisions
2
Grants
0
Denials
2
Total decisions
2
Grants
0
Denials
2
Total decisions
2
Grants
0
Denials
2
Total decisions
1
Grants
0
Denials
1
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.