Honduras
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
172
Grants
7
Denials
165
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
6.1%
35 / 575
Total decisions
575
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
6.1%
Grants: 35
Denial rate
93.9%
Denials: 540
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Nicholle M. Hempel was appointed as an Immigration Judge to begin hearing cases in April 2021. Judge Hempel earned a Bachelor of Arts in 1996 from California State University, Fresnoand a Juris Doctor in 2000 from Chicago-Kent College of Law. From 2010 to 2021, she servedas an Assistant Chief Counsel, Office of the Principal Legal Advisor, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security, in Los Angeles. From 2003 to 2010, she servedas an Assistant State Attorney with the Cook County State’s Attorney’s Office, in Chicago. From 1998 to 2003, she served as a Law Clerk for the First Municipal District, Circuit Court of Cook County, in Chicago. Judge Hempel is a member of the Illinois State Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Nicholle M Hempel.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Honduras Sufficient sample | 172 | 7 | 165 | 4.1% | 95.9% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 107 | 4 | 103 | 3.7% | 96.3% | View details | |
Mexico Sufficient sample | 84 | 1 | 83 | 1.2% | 98.8% | View details | |
Niue Sufficient sample | 49 | 6 | 43 | 12.2% | 87.8% | View details | |
Venezuela Sufficient sample | 48 | 11 | 37 | 22.9% | 77.1% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 42 | 0 | 42 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Colombia Moderate sample | 25 | 0 | 25 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Cuba Moderate sample | 17 | 2 | 15 | 11.8% | 88.2% | View details | |
Ecuador Small sample | 7 | 0 | 7 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Argentina Small sample | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Cameroon Small sample | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Ethiopia Small sample | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Georgia Small sample | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
India Small sample | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Pakistan Small sample | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Peru Small sample | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Syria Small sample | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Turkiye Small sample | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Afghanistan Small sample | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Congo - Kinshasa Small sample | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details |
Total decisions
172
Grants
7
Denials
165
Total decisions
107
Grants
4
Denials
103
Total decisions
84
Grants
1
Denials
83
Total decisions
49
Grants
6
Denials
43
Total decisions
48
Grants
11
Denials
37
Total decisions
42
Grants
0
Denials
42
Total decisions
25
Grants
0
Denials
25
Total decisions
17
Grants
2
Denials
15
Total decisions
7
Grants
0
Denials
7
Total decisions
2
Grants
0
Denials
2
Total decisions
2
Grants
0
Denials
2
Total decisions
2
Grants
0
Denials
2
Total decisions
2
Grants
0
Denials
2
Total decisions
2
Grants
0
Denials
2
Total decisions
2
Grants
2
Denials
0
Total decisions
2
Grants
0
Denials
2
Total decisions
2
Grants
2
Denials
0
Total decisions
2
Grants
0
Denials
2
Total decisions
1
Grants
0
Denials
1
Total decisions
1
Grants
0
Denials
1
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.