Honduras
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
49
Grants
5
Denials
44
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
34.4%
43 / 125
Total decisions
125
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
34.4%
Grants: 43
Denial rate
65.6%
Denials: 82
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Megan R. Jackler was appointed as an Assistant Chief Immigration Judge to begin supervisoryimmigration court duties and hearing cases in July 2021. Judge Jackler earned a Bachelor of Artsin 2003 from Barnard College and a Juris Doctor in 2008 from the American University Washington College of Law. From 2009 to 2021, she served as a U.S. Navy Judge Advocate, inthe following locations: Norfolk, Virginia; Pearl Harbor, Hawaii; Gulfport, Mississippi; Mazar-e-Sharif, Afghanistan; and Yokosuka, Japan. From 2003 to 2005, she was a Litigation Paralegalwith Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, in New York. Judge Jackler is a member of the District of Columbia Bar, New Jersey State Bar, New York State Bar, and Virginia State Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Megan R Jackler.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Honduras Sufficient sample | 49 | 5 | 44 | 10.2% | 89.8% | View details | |
Niue Moderate sample | 18 | 14 | 4 | 77.8% | 22.2% | View details | |
Venezuela Moderate sample | 11 | 7 | 4 | 63.6% | 36.4% | View details | |
Brazil Moderate sample | 10 | 0 | 10 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Guatemala Small sample | 7 | 0 | 7 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
India Small sample | 5 | 4 | 1 | 80.0% | 20.0% | View details | |
Mauritania Small sample | 5 | 5 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Spain Small sample | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Cuba Small sample | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Switzerland Small sample | 3 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Guinea Small sample | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Mexico Small sample | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Bolivia Small sample | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Cameroon Small sample | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Colombia Small sample | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Gabon Small sample | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Nicaragua Small sample | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Turkiye Small sample | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Afghanistan Small sample | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | - | View details | |
Armenia Small sample | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | - | View details |
Total decisions
49
Grants
5
Denials
44
Total decisions
18
Grants
14
Denials
4
Total decisions
11
Grants
7
Denials
4
Total decisions
10
Grants
0
Denials
10
Total decisions
7
Grants
0
Denials
7
Total decisions
5
Grants
4
Denials
1
Total decisions
5
Grants
5
Denials
0
Total decisions
4
Grants
0
Denials
4
Total decisions
3
Grants
0
Denials
3
Total decisions
3
Grants
3
Denials
0
Total decisions
2
Grants
2
Denials
0
Total decisions
2
Grants
0
Denials
2
Total decisions
1
Grants
1
Denials
0
Total decisions
1
Grants
1
Denials
0
Total decisions
1
Grants
1
Denials
0
Total decisions
1
Grants
0
Denials
1
Total decisions
1
Grants
0
Denials
1
Total decisions
1
Grants
0
Denials
1
Total decisions
0
Grants
0
Denials
0
Total decisions
0
Grants
0
Denials
0
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.