Immigration judge

Jason Jones

Community discussion · 0

Public EOIR asylum decision statistics

Status
active
Data source
EOIR Case Data

Grant rate

47.7%

62 / 130

Total decisions

130

Merits decision sample in current public statistics

Grant rate

47.7%

Grants: 62

Denial rate

52.3%

Denials: 68

Other relief rate

0.0%

Other relief: 0

Judge profile

This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.

Jason L. Jones was appointed as an Immigration Judge to begin hearing cases in February 2023. Judge Jones earned a Bachelor of Arts in 1995 and a Master of Arts in 1996, both from Old Dominion University, a Juris Doctor in 2001 from Oklahoma City University School of Law, and Master of Laws in Trial Advocacy in 2013 from Temple University School of Law. From 2021 to 2022, he served at the Department of the Navy as complex case counsel- prosecution, and from 2018 to 2021, he served as the Navy’s director, Trial Counsel Assistance Program. From 2016 to 2018, he served as a military judge in the Southeast Judicial Circuit, Mayport, Florida. From 2002 to 2004, 2008 to 2010, and 2013 to 2016, he served as a military defense counsel at Naval Station San Diego, California; Naval Air Station Jacksonville, Florida; and Naval Station Bremerton, Washington. From 2004 to 2006, he served as assistant staff judge advocate at Naval Criminal Investigative Service Headquarters in Washington, D.C. From 2006 to 2007, and from 2010 to 2012, he served as the senior trial counsel at Legal Services Support Team Iraq, 1st Marine Logistics Group, Al-Anbar Province, Iraq, and at Naval Air Station Jacksonville, Florida. From 2007 to 2008, he served as an appellate law clerk at the Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals. From 2012 to 2013, while in the Navy, he served as a special assistant U.S. attorney at the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. Judge Jones is a member of the State Bar of California and the District of Columbia Bar.

This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.

Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report

Outcome distribution

Grants62 / 130
Denials68 / 130
Other relief0 / 130

Community perspective

Community discussion

Read public experiences and process discussions related to Jason Jones.

0 topics

You can start with these public topics

  • Share a public process or preparation experience
  • Discuss how to interpret public data
  • Ask a question without personal case details

Case details

0 rows

This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.

Case Ratio

-

Distribution

Showing 0 of 0

View by applicant nationality

Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.

Honduras

Sufficient sample
View details

Total decisions

44

Grants

10

Denials

34

Grant rate: 22.7%Denial rate: 77.3%

Niue

Moderate sample
View details

Total decisions

27

Grants

25

Denials

2

Grant rate: 92.6%Denial rate: 7.4%

Guatemala

Moderate sample
View details

Total decisions

10

Grants

0

Denials

10

Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%

India

Small sample
View details

Total decisions

8

Grants

4

Denials

4

Grant rate: 50.0%Denial rate: 50.0%

Mexico

Small sample
View details

Total decisions

8

Grants

5

Denials

3

Grant rate: 62.5%Denial rate: 37.5%

Brazil

Small sample
View details

Total decisions

6

Grants

0

Denials

6

Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%

Switzerland

Small sample
View details

Total decisions

5

Grants

1

Denials

4

Grant rate: 20.0%Denial rate: 80.0%

Russia

Small sample
View details

Total decisions

4

Grants

4

Denials

0

Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%

Cuba

Small sample
View details

Total decisions

3

Grants

1

Denials

2

Grant rate: 33.3%Denial rate: 66.7%

Colombia

Small sample
View details

Total decisions

2

Grants

2

Denials

0

Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%

Mauritania

Small sample
View details

Total decisions

2

Grants

2

Denials

0

Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%

Pitcairn Islands

Small sample
View details

Total decisions

2

Grants

2

Denials

0

Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%

Spain

Small sample
View details

Total decisions

2

Grants

1

Denials

1

Grant rate: 50.0%Denial rate: 50.0%

Bahrain

Small sample
View details

Total decisions

1

Grants

0

Denials

1

Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%

Cameroon

Small sample
View details

Total decisions

1

Grants

1

Denials

0

Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%

Ghana

Small sample
View details

Total decisions

1

Grants

0

Denials

1

Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%

Haiti

Small sample
View details

Total decisions

1

Grants

1

Denials

0

Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%

Pakistan

Small sample
View details

Total decisions

1

Grants

1

Denials

0

Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%

Peru

Small sample
View details

Total decisions

1

Grants

1

Denials

0

Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%

Vietnam

Small sample
View details

Total decisions

1

Grants

1

Denials

0

Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%

These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.

Other judges at the same immigration court

Charles Adkins-Blanch

Status: active

Asylum Grant Rate
45.6%
Denial Rate
54.4%
View details

Alberto Depuy

Status: active

Asylum Grant Rate
40.2%
Denial Rate
59.8%
View details

Lorely Ramirez Fernandez

Status: active

Asylum Grant Rate
17.6%
Denial Rate
82.4%
View details

Kevin P Guillory

Status: active

Asylum Grant Rate
40.5%
Denial Rate
59.5%
View details

Megan R Jackler

Status: active

Asylum Grant Rate
34.4%
Denial Rate
65.6%
View details

Gabrielle Jones

Status: active

Asylum Grant Rate
45.3%
Denial Rate
54.7%
View details
Disclaimer

This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.