Colombia
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
58
Grants
12
Denials
46
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
12.5%
29 / 232
Total decisions
232
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
12.5%
Grants: 29
Denial rate
87.5%
Denials: 203
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Rohit Khanna was appointed as an immigration judge to begin hearing cases in November 2023. Judge Khanna earned a Bachelor of Arts in 2002 from the University of Florida and a Juris Doctor in 2006 from the Barry University School of Law. From 2011 to 2023, he practiced immigration law with Dehra Miotke LLC in Tampa, Florida. From 2010 to 2011, he practiced immigration first with Maney and Gordon, P.A. and then with the RK Law Firm, both in Tampa. In 2008 to 2010, he was a clerk and attorney with Ellen R. Gorman PA in St. Petersburg, Florida. In 2007, he was a business immigration consultant for the technology services company of Pro V International in Tampa. Judge Khanna is a member of the District of Columbia Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Rohit Khanna.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Colombia Sufficient sample | 58 | 12 | 46 | 20.7% | 79.3% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 46 | 4 | 42 | 8.7% | 91.3% | View details | |
Mexico Sufficient sample | 30 | 1 | 29 | 3.3% | 96.7% | View details | |
Honduras Moderate sample | 14 | 0 | 14 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Cuba Moderate sample | 12 | 0 | 12 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Niue Moderate sample | 12 | 0 | 12 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Peru Moderate sample | 11 | 3 | 8 | 27.3% | 72.7% | View details | |
Russia Moderate sample | 10 | 5 | 5 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Brazil Small sample | 9 | 0 | 9 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Venezuela Small sample | 9 | 0 | 9 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Haiti Small sample | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Ecuador Small sample | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Spain Small sample | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Vietnam Small sample | 4 | 3 | 1 | 75.0% | 25.0% | View details | |
Belize Small sample | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Myanmar (Burma) Small sample | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
St. Barthélemy Small sample | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Uzbekistan Small sample | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Argentina Small sample | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | - | View details | |
Bulgaria Small sample | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | - | View details |
Total decisions
58
Grants
12
Denials
46
Total decisions
46
Grants
4
Denials
42
Total decisions
30
Grants
1
Denials
29
Total decisions
14
Grants
0
Denials
14
Total decisions
12
Grants
0
Denials
12
Total decisions
12
Grants
0
Denials
12
Total decisions
11
Grants
3
Denials
8
Total decisions
10
Grants
5
Denials
5
Total decisions
9
Grants
0
Denials
9
Total decisions
9
Grants
0
Denials
9
Total decisions
5
Grants
0
Denials
5
Total decisions
4
Grants
0
Denials
4
Total decisions
4
Grants
0
Denials
4
Total decisions
4
Grants
3
Denials
1
Total decisions
1
Grants
1
Denials
0
Total decisions
1
Grants
0
Denials
1
Total decisions
1
Grants
0
Denials
1
Total decisions
1
Grants
0
Denials
1
Total decisions
0
Grants
0
Denials
0
Total decisions
0
Grants
0
Denials
0
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.