Guatemala
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
480
Grants
10
Denials
470
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
16.8%
441 / 2618
Total decisions
2618
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
16.8%
Grants: 441
Denial rate
83.2%
Denials: 2177
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Judge Law was appointed as an Immigration Judge in May 1997. Prior to his transfer to the Immigration Court in Houston in March 1999, Judge Law served as an Immigration Judge at the Immigration Court in Los Angeles, California. He received a Bachelor of Arts degree in 1976 from the University of Texas at Austin, and a Juris Doctorate in 1985 from South Texas College of Law in Houston. Prior to joining the Executive Office for Immigration Review, Judge Law was assistant district counsel, for the former Immigration and Naturalization Service, in Houston, Texas. He is a member of the State Bar of Texas.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Philip S Law.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 480 | 10 | 470 | 2.1% | 97.9% | View details | |
Mexico Sufficient sample | 460 | 14 | 446 | 3.0% | 97.0% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 460 | 10 | 450 | 2.2% | 97.8% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 206 | 5 | 201 | 2.4% | 97.6% | View details | |
Colombia Sufficient sample | 97 | 32 | 65 | 33.0% | 67.0% | View details | |
Switzerland Sufficient sample | 80 | 39 | 41 | 48.8% | 51.2% | View details | |
Cameroon Sufficient sample | 71 | 28 | 43 | 39.4% | 60.6% | View details | |
Iran Sufficient sample | 59 | 38 | 21 | 64.4% | 35.6% | View details | |
Pakistan Sufficient sample | 59 | 13 | 46 | 22.0% | 78.0% | View details | |
Iraq Sufficient sample | 48 | 35 | 13 | 72.9% | 27.1% | View details | |
Somalia Sufficient sample | 46 | 28 | 18 | 60.9% | 39.1% | View details | |
Haiti Sufficient sample | 39 | 4 | 35 | 10.3% | 89.7% | View details | |
Russia Sufficient sample | 37 | 19 | 18 | 51.4% | 48.6% | View details | |
India Sufficient sample | 36 | 5 | 31 | 13.9% | 86.1% | View details | |
Nicaragua Sufficient sample | 33 | 6 | 27 | 18.2% | 81.8% | View details | |
Niue Sufficient sample | 30 | 6 | 24 | 20.0% | 80.0% | View details | |
Ethiopia Moderate sample | 26 | 15 | 11 | 57.7% | 42.3% | View details | |
Lebanon Moderate sample | 21 | 8 | 13 | 38.1% | 61.9% | View details | |
Eritrea Moderate sample | 18 | 9 | 9 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Peru Moderate sample | 16 | 6 | 10 | 37.5% | 62.5% | View details |
Total decisions
480
Grants
10
Denials
470
Total decisions
460
Grants
14
Denials
446
Total decisions
460
Grants
10
Denials
450
Total decisions
206
Grants
5
Denials
201
Total decisions
97
Grants
32
Denials
65
Total decisions
80
Grants
39
Denials
41
Total decisions
71
Grants
28
Denials
43
Total decisions
59
Grants
38
Denials
21
Total decisions
59
Grants
13
Denials
46
Total decisions
48
Grants
35
Denials
13
Total decisions
46
Grants
28
Denials
18
Total decisions
39
Grants
4
Denials
35
Total decisions
37
Grants
19
Denials
18
Total decisions
36
Grants
5
Denials
31
Total decisions
33
Grants
6
Denials
27
Total decisions
30
Grants
6
Denials
24
Total decisions
26
Grants
15
Denials
11
Total decisions
21
Grants
8
Denials
13
Total decisions
18
Grants
9
Denials
9
Total decisions
16
Grants
6
Denials
10
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.