Switzerland
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
89
Grants
81
Denials
8
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
64.5%
318 / 493
Total decisions
493
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
64.5%
Grants: 318
Denial rate
35.5%
Denials: 175
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Attorney General Barr appointed David A. Norkin to begin hearing cases in January 2020. Judge Norkin earned a Bachelor of Arts in 1995 from Bates College and a Juris Doctor in 1999 from The George Washington University Law School. In 2019, he served as court administrator for the Fishkill, Ulster, and Varick immigration courts. From 1999 to 2016, he served as a judge advocate, defense counsel, prosecutor, special assistant U.S. attorney, and appellate military judge in the following locations: Naval Base San Diego, California; Naval Station Pearl Harbor, Hawaii; Fleet Activities Yokosuka, Japan; and Washington Navy Yard, District of Columbia. Judge Norkin is a member of the Hawaii State Bar, Maryland State Bar, and New York State Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to David Norkin.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Switzerland Sufficient sample | 89 | 81 | 8 | 91.0% | 9.0% | View details | |
India Sufficient sample | 60 | 37 | 23 | 61.7% | 38.3% | View details | |
Ecuador Sufficient sample | 53 | 10 | 43 | 18.9% | 81.1% | View details | |
Bulgaria Sufficient sample | 31 | 29 | 2 | 93.5% | 6.5% | View details | |
Cuba Moderate sample | 29 | 14 | 15 | 48.3% | 51.7% | View details | |
Venezuela Moderate sample | 28 | 20 | 8 | 71.4% | 28.6% | View details | |
Honduras Moderate sample | 26 | 14 | 12 | 53.8% | 46.2% | View details | |
Cameroon Moderate sample | 22 | 6 | 16 | 27.3% | 72.7% | View details | |
Nepal Moderate sample | 21 | 20 | 1 | 95.2% | 4.8% | View details | |
Niue Moderate sample | 21 | 8 | 13 | 38.1% | 61.9% | View details | |
Spain Moderate sample | 16 | 9 | 7 | 56.3% | 43.8% | View details | |
Pakistan Moderate sample | 12 | 12 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Guatemala Moderate sample | 10 | 2 | 8 | 20.0% | 80.0% | View details | |
Egypt Small sample | 9 | 8 | 1 | 88.9% | 11.1% | View details | |
Colombia Small sample | 7 | 2 | 5 | 28.6% | 71.4% | View details | |
Russia Small sample | 7 | 7 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Turkiye Small sample | 6 | 6 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Albania Small sample | 5 | 5 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Eritrea Small sample | 4 | 3 | 1 | 75.0% | 25.0% | View details | |
Peru Small sample | 4 | 1 | 3 | 25.0% | 75.0% | View details |
Total decisions
89
Grants
81
Denials
8
Total decisions
60
Grants
37
Denials
23
Total decisions
53
Grants
10
Denials
43
Total decisions
31
Grants
29
Denials
2
Total decisions
29
Grants
14
Denials
15
Total decisions
28
Grants
20
Denials
8
Total decisions
26
Grants
14
Denials
12
Total decisions
22
Grants
6
Denials
16
Total decisions
21
Grants
20
Denials
1
Total decisions
21
Grants
8
Denials
13
Total decisions
16
Grants
9
Denials
7
Total decisions
12
Grants
12
Denials
0
Total decisions
10
Grants
2
Denials
8
Total decisions
9
Grants
8
Denials
1
Total decisions
7
Grants
2
Denials
5
Total decisions
7
Grants
7
Denials
0
Total decisions
6
Grants
6
Denials
0
Total decisions
5
Grants
5
Denials
0
Total decisions
4
Grants
3
Denials
1
Total decisions
4
Grants
1
Denials
3
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.