Mexico
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
246
Grants
0
Denials
246
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
9.6%
94 / 984
Total decisions
984
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
9.6%
Grants: 94
Denial rate
90.5%
Denials: 890
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Agnieszka (“Aggie”) Dolinska Norregard was appointed as an Immigration Judge to begin hearing cases in March 2022. Judge Norregard earned a Bachelor of Arts in 1998 from Boise State University and a Juris Doctor in 2001 from Brigham Young University, J. Reuben Clark Law School of Law. Judge Norregard has been in private practice as an Immigration Attorney her entire career. From 2018 to 2022, she served as Managing Attorney of Wilner & O’Reilly’s Riverside, California office, and from 2008 to 2018, as an Associate Attorney with the firm’s Orange County, California, office. From 2003 to 2008, she was an Associate Attorney with the Law Offices of John R. Alcorn in Irvine. Judge Norregard is a member of the State Bar of California and the Utah State Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Aggie Norregard.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mexico Sufficient sample | 246 | 0 | 246 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Colombia Sufficient sample | 119 | 1 | 118 | 0.8% | 99.2% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 112 | 0 | 112 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Niue Sufficient sample | 112 | 12 | 100 | 10.7% | 89.3% | View details | |
Peru Sufficient sample | 73 | 0 | 73 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Switzerland Sufficient sample | 58 | 25 | 33 | 43.1% | 56.9% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 40 | 0 | 40 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
India Sufficient sample | 38 | 3 | 35 | 7.9% | 92.1% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 37 | 0 | 37 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Venezuela Sufficient sample | 36 | 4 | 32 | 11.1% | 88.9% | View details | |
Iran Moderate sample | 19 | 9 | 10 | 47.4% | 52.6% | View details | |
Russia Moderate sample | 18 | 15 | 3 | 83.3% | 16.7% | View details | |
Egypt Moderate sample | 12 | 10 | 2 | 83.3% | 16.7% | View details | |
Romania Small sample | 9 | 0 | 9 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Ecuador Small sample | 7 | 0 | 7 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Cuba Small sample | 6 | 0 | 6 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Indonesia Small sample | 6 | 4 | 2 | 66.7% | 33.3% | View details | |
China Small sample | 5 | 5 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Pakistan Small sample | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Georgia Small sample | 3 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details |
Total decisions
246
Grants
0
Denials
246
Total decisions
119
Grants
1
Denials
118
Total decisions
112
Grants
0
Denials
112
Total decisions
112
Grants
12
Denials
100
Total decisions
73
Grants
0
Denials
73
Total decisions
58
Grants
25
Denials
33
Total decisions
40
Grants
0
Denials
40
Total decisions
38
Grants
3
Denials
35
Total decisions
37
Grants
0
Denials
37
Total decisions
36
Grants
4
Denials
32
Total decisions
19
Grants
9
Denials
10
Total decisions
18
Grants
15
Denials
3
Total decisions
12
Grants
10
Denials
2
Total decisions
9
Grants
0
Denials
9
Total decisions
7
Grants
0
Denials
7
Total decisions
6
Grants
0
Denials
6
Total decisions
6
Grants
4
Denials
2
Total decisions
5
Grants
5
Denials
0
Total decisions
4
Grants
0
Denials
4
Total decisions
3
Grants
3
Denials
0
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.