Honduras
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
134
Grants
4
Denials
130
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
4.7%
27 / 571
Total decisions
571
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
4.7%
Grants: 27
Denial rate
95.3%
Denials: 544
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Artie R. Pobjecky was appointed as an Immigration Judge to begin hearing cases in July 2021.Judge Pobjecky earned a Bachelor of Arts in 1997 from the University of Central Florida and a Juris Doctor in 2001 from Baylor University School of Law. From 2007 to 2021, she was a Partner with Pobjecky & Pobjecky LLP, in Winter Haven, Florida. From 2015 to 2017, sheserved as Chair of the American Immigration Lawyers Association, Central Florida Chapter.From 2002 to 2007, she was an Associate Attorney with J. David Pobjecky PA, in Winter Haven.Judge Pobjecky is a member of the Florida Bar, Pennsylvania Bar, and the State Bar of Texas.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Artie Pobjecky.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Honduras Sufficient sample | 134 | 4 | 130 | 3.0% | 97.0% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 102 | 1 | 101 | 1.0% | 99.0% | View details | |
Venezuela Sufficient sample | 83 | 7 | 76 | 8.4% | 91.6% | View details | |
Mexico Sufficient sample | 58 | 1 | 57 | 1.7% | 98.3% | View details | |
Cuba Sufficient sample | 41 | 2 | 39 | 4.9% | 95.1% | View details | |
Guatemala Moderate sample | 29 | 1 | 28 | 3.4% | 96.6% | View details | |
Niue Moderate sample | 29 | 1 | 28 | 3.4% | 96.6% | View details | |
Colombia Moderate sample | 27 | 0 | 27 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Ecuador Moderate sample | 10 | 0 | 10 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Iran Small sample | 6 | 1 | 5 | 16.7% | 83.3% | View details | |
Egypt Small sample | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Iraq Small sample | 4 | 4 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Turkiye Small sample | 4 | 1 | 3 | 25.0% | 75.0% | View details | |
Belize Small sample | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Bulgaria Small sample | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Peru Small sample | 3 | 1 | 2 | 33.3% | 66.7% | View details | |
Switzerland Small sample | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Afghanistan Small sample | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Cameroon Small sample | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
India Small sample | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details |
Total decisions
134
Grants
4
Denials
130
Total decisions
102
Grants
1
Denials
101
Total decisions
83
Grants
7
Denials
76
Total decisions
58
Grants
1
Denials
57
Total decisions
41
Grants
2
Denials
39
Total decisions
29
Grants
1
Denials
28
Total decisions
29
Grants
1
Denials
28
Total decisions
27
Grants
0
Denials
27
Total decisions
10
Grants
0
Denials
10
Total decisions
6
Grants
1
Denials
5
Total decisions
4
Grants
0
Denials
4
Total decisions
4
Grants
4
Denials
0
Total decisions
4
Grants
1
Denials
3
Total decisions
3
Grants
0
Denials
3
Total decisions
3
Grants
0
Denials
3
Total decisions
3
Grants
1
Denials
2
Total decisions
3
Grants
0
Denials
3
Total decisions
2
Grants
0
Denials
2
Total decisions
2
Grants
1
Denials
1
Total decisions
2
Grants
0
Denials
2
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.