Mexico
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
55
Grants
0
Denials
55
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Immigration judge
Dean S. Tuckman
Community discussion · 0Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
- Status
- active
- Data source
- EOIR Case Data
Grant rate
18.0%
51 / 283
Total decisions
283
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
18.0%
Grants: 51
Denial rate
82.0%
Denials: 232
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
Outcome distribution
Grants51 / 283
Denials232 / 283
Other relief0 / 283
Community perspective
Community discussion
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Dean S. Tuckman.
0 topics
You can start with these public topics
- Share a public process or preparation experience
- Discuss how to interpret public data
- Ask a question without personal case details
Case details
0 rowsThis table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Case Ratio
-
Distribution
Showing 0 of 0
View by applicant nationality
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mexico Sufficient sample | 55 | 0 | 55 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Venezuela Sufficient sample | 40 | 27 | 13 | 67.5% | 32.5% | View details | |
Guatemala Moderate sample | 27 | 1 | 26 | 3.7% | 96.3% | View details | |
Honduras Moderate sample | 26 | 1 | 25 | 3.8% | 96.2% | View details | |
Spain Moderate sample | 23 | 0 | 23 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Cuba Moderate sample | 19 | 8 | 11 | 42.1% | 57.9% | View details | |
Switzerland Small sample | 9 | 3 | 6 | 33.3% | 66.7% | View details | |
Cameroon Small sample | 8 | 1 | 7 | 12.5% | 87.5% | View details | |
Nepal Small sample | 7 | 0 | 7 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Niue Small sample | 7 | 3 | 4 | 42.9% | 57.1% | View details | |
Brazil Small sample | 6 | 0 | 6 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Colombia Small sample | 6 | 0 | 6 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Iran Small sample | 6 | 4 | 2 | 66.7% | 33.3% | View details | |
Ecuador Small sample | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Guinea Small sample | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Afghanistan Small sample | 3 | 1 | 2 | 33.3% | 66.7% | View details | |
Dominican Republic Small sample | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Eritrea Small sample | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Haiti Small sample | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Uzbekistan Small sample | 3 | 1 | 2 | 33.3% | 66.7% | View details |
View details
Venezuela
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
40
Grants
27
Denials
13
Grant rate: 67.5%Denial rate: 32.5%
Guatemala
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
27
Grants
1
Denials
26
Grant rate: 3.7%Denial rate: 96.3%
Honduras
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
26
Grants
1
Denials
25
Grant rate: 3.8%Denial rate: 96.2%
Spain
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
23
Grants
0
Denials
23
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Cuba
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
19
Grants
8
Denials
11
Grant rate: 42.1%Denial rate: 57.9%
Switzerland
Small sampleTotal decisions
9
Grants
3
Denials
6
Grant rate: 33.3%Denial rate: 66.7%
Cameroon
Small sampleTotal decisions
8
Grants
1
Denials
7
Grant rate: 12.5%Denial rate: 87.5%
Nepal
Small sampleTotal decisions
7
Grants
0
Denials
7
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Niue
Small sampleTotal decisions
7
Grants
3
Denials
4
Grant rate: 42.9%Denial rate: 57.1%
Brazil
Small sampleTotal decisions
6
Grants
0
Denials
6
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Colombia
Small sampleTotal decisions
6
Grants
0
Denials
6
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Iran
Small sampleTotal decisions
6
Grants
4
Denials
2
Grant rate: 66.7%Denial rate: 33.3%
Ecuador
Small sampleTotal decisions
5
Grants
0
Denials
5
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Guinea
Small sampleTotal decisions
5
Grants
0
Denials
5
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Afghanistan
Small sampleTotal decisions
3
Grants
1
Denials
2
Grant rate: 33.3%Denial rate: 66.7%
Dominican Republic
Small sampleTotal decisions
3
Grants
0
Denials
3
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Eritrea
Small sampleTotal decisions
3
Grants
0
Denials
3
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Haiti
Small sampleTotal decisions
3
Grants
0
Denials
3
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Uzbekistan
Small sampleTotal decisions
3
Grants
1
Denials
2
Grant rate: 33.3%Denial rate: 66.7%
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Other judges at the same immigration court
William L Abbott
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 15.7%
- Denial Rate
- 84.3%
Matthew Andrasko
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 8.5%
- Denial Rate
- 91.5%
R. Lee Erwin
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 27.2%
- Denial Rate
- 72.8%
Guadalupe R. Gonzalez
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 7.5%
- Denial Rate
- 92.5%
Nicholas B. Lucic
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 2.2%
- Denial Rate
- 97.8%
Sunita B. Mahtabfar
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 12.6%
- Denial Rate
- 87.4%
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.