Spain
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
426
Grants
250
Denials
176
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
47.7%
725 / 1519
Total decisions
1519
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
47.7%
Grants: 725
Denial rate
52.3%
Denials: 794
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Attorney General Jeff Sessions appointed Dinesh C. Verma to begin hearing cases in November 2017. Judge Verma earned a Bachelor of Arts degree in 1995 from Boston Universityand a Juris Doctor in 1998 from the George Washington University Law School. From 2000 to 2017, he was a partner at Nankin & Verma PLLC, in Bethesda, Md. From 1999 to 2000, he wasan associate attorney at Ludwig & Robinson PLLC, in Washington, D.C. From 1998 to 1999, heserved as a judicial law clerk to Special Master Laura D. Millman at the U.S. Court of Federal Claims, in Washington, D.C. Judge Verma is a member of the District of Columbia Bar and Maryland State Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Dinesh C Verma.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Spain Sufficient sample | 426 | 250 | 176 | 58.7% | 41.3% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 267 | 124 | 143 | 46.4% | 53.6% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 264 | 88 | 176 | 33.3% | 66.7% | View details | |
Cameroon Sufficient sample | 111 | 58 | 53 | 52.3% | 47.7% | View details | |
Venezuela Sufficient sample | 69 | 28 | 41 | 40.6% | 59.4% | View details | |
Peru Sufficient sample | 57 | 23 | 34 | 40.4% | 59.6% | View details | |
Ethiopia Sufficient sample | 41 | 32 | 9 | 78.0% | 22.0% | View details | |
Niue Sufficient sample | 34 | 18 | 16 | 52.9% | 47.1% | View details | |
Mexico Moderate sample | 27 | 7 | 20 | 25.9% | 74.1% | View details | |
Brazil Moderate sample | 23 | 1 | 22 | 4.3% | 95.7% | View details | |
Colombia Moderate sample | 16 | 6 | 10 | 37.5% | 62.5% | View details | |
Ecuador Moderate sample | 16 | 2 | 14 | 12.5% | 87.5% | View details | |
St. Barthélemy Moderate sample | 12 | 1 | 11 | 8.3% | 91.7% | View details | |
Eritrea Moderate sample | 11 | 8 | 3 | 72.7% | 27.3% | View details | |
Bulgaria Moderate sample | 10 | 6 | 4 | 60.0% | 40.0% | View details | |
Guinea Moderate sample | 10 | 4 | 6 | 40.0% | 60.0% | View details | |
Romania Small sample | 9 | 0 | 9 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Nicaragua Small sample | 8 | 4 | 4 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Haiti Small sample | 7 | 2 | 5 | 28.6% | 71.4% | View details | |
Uganda Small sample | 7 | 6 | 1 | 85.7% | 14.3% | View details |
Total decisions
426
Grants
250
Denials
176
Total decisions
267
Grants
124
Denials
143
Total decisions
264
Grants
88
Denials
176
Total decisions
111
Grants
58
Denials
53
Total decisions
69
Grants
28
Denials
41
Total decisions
57
Grants
23
Denials
34
Total decisions
41
Grants
32
Denials
9
Total decisions
34
Grants
18
Denials
16
Total decisions
27
Grants
7
Denials
20
Total decisions
23
Grants
1
Denials
22
Total decisions
16
Grants
6
Denials
10
Total decisions
16
Grants
2
Denials
14
Total decisions
12
Grants
1
Denials
11
Total decisions
11
Grants
8
Denials
3
Total decisions
10
Grants
6
Denials
4
Total decisions
10
Grants
4
Denials
6
Total decisions
9
Grants
0
Denials
9
Total decisions
8
Grants
4
Denials
4
Total decisions
7
Grants
2
Denials
5
Total decisions
7
Grants
6
Denials
1
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.