Immigration judge

Charles N Purnell

Community discussion · 0

Public EOIR asylum decision statistics

Status
active
Data source
EOIR Case Data

Grant rate

3.0%

12 / 406

Total decisions

406

Merits decision sample in current public statistics

Grant rate

3.0%

Grants: 12

Denial rate

97.0%

Denials: 394

Other relief rate

0.0%

Other relief: 0

Judge profile

This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.

Charles N. Purnell was appointed as an Immigration Judge to begin hearing cases in February 2023. Judge Purnell earned a Bachelor of Arts in 1984 from the California State University, Fullerton, a Juris Doctor in 1987 from Vanderbilt University Law School, and two Master of Laws in 2001 from George Washington University Law School and Georgetown University Law School, respectively. From 2018 to 2022, he served as assistant judge advocate general/chief judge, Department of the Navy in Washington. From 2015 to 2018, he served as chief judge of the Navy and Marine Corps Trial Judiciary in Washington. From 2014 to 2015, he served as the circuit judge of the Central Judicial Circuit in Norfolk, Virginia. From 2012 to 2014, he served as commanding officer, Defense Service Office Southeast, in Norfolk. From 2010 to 2012, he served as director, Defense Counsel Assistance Program in Washington. From 2009 to 2010, he served as director, Appellate Defense Division in Washington. From 2006 to 2009, he served as assistant staff judge advocate and staff judge advocate, U.S. Fleet Forces Command in Norfolk. From 1989 to 2006, he served as a judge advocate with the U.S. Navy in the following locations: Washington Navy Yard; Pearl Harbor, Hawaii; Cruiser Destroyer Group TWO; National Naval Medical Center; the Pentagon; Amphibious Squadron THREE; and Great Lakes, Illinois. From 1987 to 1989, he was an associate with Watson, Ess, Marshall & Enggas in Kansas City, Missouri. In 2023, he retired as a rear admiral from the U.S. Navy. Judge Purnell is a member of the Missouri Bar.

This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.

Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report

Outcome distribution

Grants12 / 406
Denials394 / 406
Other relief0 / 406

Community perspective

Community discussion

Read public experiences and process discussions related to Charles N Purnell.

0 topics

You can start with these public topics

  • Share a public process or preparation experience
  • Discuss how to interpret public data
  • Ask a question without personal case details

Case details

0 rows

This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.

Case Ratio

-

Distribution

Showing 0 of 0

View by applicant nationality

Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.

Honduras

Sufficient sample
View details

Total decisions

104

Grants

3

Denials

101

Grant rate: 2.9%Denial rate: 97.1%

Guatemala

Sufficient sample
View details

Total decisions

50

Grants

1

Denials

49

Grant rate: 2.0%Denial rate: 98.0%

Spain

Sufficient sample
View details

Total decisions

44

Grants

0

Denials

44

Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%

Mexico

Sufficient sample
View details

Total decisions

37

Grants

0

Denials

37

Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%

Niue

Moderate sample
View details

Total decisions

20

Grants

2

Denials

18

Grant rate: 10.0%Denial rate: 90.0%

Brazil

Moderate sample
View details

Total decisions

19

Grants

0

Denials

19

Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%

Venezuela

Moderate sample
View details

Total decisions

14

Grants

0

Denials

14

Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%

Dominican Republic

Moderate sample
View details

Total decisions

10

Grants

0

Denials

10

Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%

Cuba

Small sample
View details

Total decisions

9

Grants

1

Denials

8

Grant rate: 11.1%Denial rate: 88.9%

Peru

Small sample
View details

Total decisions

9

Grants

0

Denials

9

Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%

Switzerland

Small sample
View details

Total decisions

8

Grants

0

Denials

8

Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%

Colombia

Small sample
View details

Total decisions

7

Grants

0

Denials

7

Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%

Turkiye

Small sample
View details

Total decisions

5

Grants

3

Denials

2

Grant rate: 60.0%Denial rate: 40.0%

Bahrain

Small sample
View details

Total decisions

4

Grants

0

Denials

4

Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%

Cameroon

Small sample
View details

Total decisions

4

Grants

0

Denials

4

Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%

India

Small sample
View details

Total decisions

4

Grants

0

Denials

4

Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%

Nicaragua

Small sample
View details

Total decisions

4

Grants

0

Denials

4

Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%

Romania

Small sample
View details

Total decisions

4

Grants

0

Denials

4

Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%

Russia

Small sample
View details

Total decisions

4

Grants

0

Denials

4

Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%

Singapore

Small sample
View details

Total decisions

4

Grants

0

Denials

4

Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%

These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.

Other judges at the same immigration court

Abby Anna. Batko-Taylor

Status: active

Asylum Grant Rate
49.8%
Denial Rate
50.2%
View details

V. Stuart Couch

Status: active

Asylum Grant Rate
10.9%
Denial Rate
89.1%
View details

Scott D Criss

Status: active

Asylum Grant Rate
12.8%
Denial Rate
87.2%
View details

Chadwick Dotson

Status: active

Asylum Grant Rate
18.8%
Denial Rate
81.2%
View details

James C. Graulich

Status: active

Asylum Grant Rate
10.0%
Denial Rate
90.0%
View details

Rodger C Harris

Status: active

Asylum Grant Rate
22.9%
Denial Rate
77.1%
View details
Disclaimer

This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.