Switzerland
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
166
Grants
133
Denials
33
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
47.9%
519 / 1083
Total decisions
1083
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
47.9%
Grants: 519
Denial rate
52.1%
Denials: 564
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Attorney General William P. Barr appointed Andrew M. Calvelli as an immigration judge in March 2020. Judge Calvelli earned a Bachelor of Arts in 1987 from the University of Virginiaand a Juris Doctor in 1996 from Rutgers University School of Law. From 2016 to 2020, heserved as an administrative law judge for the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, in Harrisburg. From 2010 to 2016, he served as an administrative law judge for the Pennsylvania Department of Labor and Industry, in Philadelphia and King of Prussia. From 1996 to 2010, hewas in private practice, in Malvern, Pennsylvania and Wayne, Pennsylvania. Judge Calvelli is amember of the Pennsylvania State Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Andrew Calvelli.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Switzerland Sufficient sample | 166 | 133 | 33 | 80.1% | 19.9% | View details | |
India Sufficient sample | 100 | 50 | 50 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Ecuador Sufficient sample | 76 | 15 | 61 | 19.7% | 80.3% | View details | |
Singapore Sufficient sample | 74 | 7 | 67 | 9.5% | 90.5% | View details | |
Guinea Sufficient sample | 72 | 25 | 47 | 34.7% | 65.3% | View details | |
Ghana Sufficient sample | 63 | 28 | 35 | 44.4% | 55.6% | View details | |
Bulgaria Sufficient sample | 45 | 30 | 15 | 66.7% | 33.3% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 43 | 14 | 29 | 32.6% | 67.4% | View details | |
Mauritania Sufficient sample | 33 | 10 | 23 | 30.3% | 69.7% | View details | |
Guatemala Moderate sample | 28 | 4 | 24 | 14.3% | 85.7% | View details | |
Russia Moderate sample | 26 | 22 | 4 | 84.6% | 15.4% | View details | |
Venezuela Moderate sample | 26 | 13 | 13 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Nepal Moderate sample | 24 | 13 | 11 | 54.2% | 45.8% | View details | |
Bolivia Moderate sample | 22 | 12 | 10 | 54.5% | 45.5% | View details | |
Albania Moderate sample | 21 | 14 | 7 | 66.7% | 33.3% | View details | |
Pakistan Moderate sample | 19 | 10 | 9 | 52.6% | 47.4% | View details | |
Peru Moderate sample | 19 | 4 | 15 | 21.1% | 78.9% | View details | |
Colombia Moderate sample | 17 | 7 | 10 | 41.2% | 58.8% | View details | |
Honduras Moderate sample | 16 | 7 | 9 | 43.8% | 56.3% | View details | |
Dominican Republic Moderate sample | 15 | 0 | 15 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details |
Total decisions
166
Grants
133
Denials
33
Total decisions
100
Grants
50
Denials
50
Total decisions
76
Grants
15
Denials
61
Total decisions
74
Grants
7
Denials
67
Total decisions
72
Grants
25
Denials
47
Total decisions
63
Grants
28
Denials
35
Total decisions
45
Grants
30
Denials
15
Total decisions
43
Grants
14
Denials
29
Total decisions
33
Grants
10
Denials
23
Total decisions
28
Grants
4
Denials
24
Total decisions
26
Grants
22
Denials
4
Total decisions
26
Grants
13
Denials
13
Total decisions
24
Grants
13
Denials
11
Total decisions
22
Grants
12
Denials
10
Total decisions
21
Grants
14
Denials
7
Total decisions
19
Grants
10
Denials
9
Total decisions
19
Grants
4
Denials
15
Total decisions
17
Grants
7
Denials
10
Total decisions
16
Grants
7
Denials
9
Total decisions
15
Grants
0
Denials
15
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.