Honduras
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
53
Grants
25
Denials
28
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
29.5%
122 / 413
Total decisions
413
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
29.5%
Grants: 122
Denial rate
70.5%
Denials: 291
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Attorney General Barr appointed Diane L. Dodd to begin hearing cases in January 2020. Judge Dodd earned a Bachelor of Arts in 1982 from the University of Georgia and a Juris Doctor in 1990 from Lewis and Clark College, Northwestern School of Law. From 2016 to 2019, she served as a special assistant U.S. attorney for the District of Minnesota, Department of Justice, in Minneapolis. From 2010 to 2019, she served as an assistant chief counsel, Office of Chief Counsel, Office of the Principal Legal Advisor, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security. From 1999 to 2010, she served as an assistant district attorney in the District Attorney’s Office, in Brunswick, Georgia. Judge Dodd is a member of the Georgia State Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Diane Dodd.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Honduras Sufficient sample | 53 | 25 | 28 | 47.2% | 52.8% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 52 | 6 | 46 | 11.5% | 88.5% | View details | |
Ecuador Sufficient sample | 49 | 6 | 43 | 12.2% | 87.8% | View details | |
Switzerland Sufficient sample | 38 | 21 | 17 | 55.3% | 44.7% | View details | |
Spain Moderate sample | 25 | 8 | 17 | 32.0% | 68.0% | View details | |
Bulgaria Moderate sample | 23 | 8 | 15 | 34.8% | 65.2% | View details | |
Guinea Moderate sample | 21 | 2 | 19 | 9.5% | 90.5% | View details | |
India Moderate sample | 21 | 3 | 18 | 14.3% | 85.7% | View details | |
Russia Moderate sample | 16 | 5 | 11 | 31.3% | 68.8% | View details | |
Singapore Moderate sample | 15 | 1 | 14 | 6.7% | 93.3% | View details | |
Jamaica Moderate sample | 10 | 4 | 6 | 40.0% | 60.0% | View details | |
Colombia Small sample | 8 | 1 | 7 | 12.5% | 87.5% | View details | |
Ghana Small sample | 8 | 6 | 2 | 75.0% | 25.0% | View details | |
Venezuela Small sample | 7 | 3 | 4 | 42.9% | 57.1% | View details | |
Georgia Small sample | 6 | 5 | 1 | 83.3% | 16.7% | View details | |
Pakistan Small sample | 6 | 3 | 3 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Bolivia Small sample | 4 | 2 | 2 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Brazil Small sample | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Mauritania Small sample | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Peru Small sample | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details |
Total decisions
53
Grants
25
Denials
28
Total decisions
52
Grants
6
Denials
46
Total decisions
49
Grants
6
Denials
43
Total decisions
38
Grants
21
Denials
17
Total decisions
25
Grants
8
Denials
17
Total decisions
23
Grants
8
Denials
15
Total decisions
21
Grants
2
Denials
19
Total decisions
21
Grants
3
Denials
18
Total decisions
16
Grants
5
Denials
11
Total decisions
15
Grants
1
Denials
14
Total decisions
10
Grants
4
Denials
6
Total decisions
8
Grants
1
Denials
7
Total decisions
8
Grants
6
Denials
2
Total decisions
7
Grants
3
Denials
4
Total decisions
6
Grants
5
Denials
1
Total decisions
6
Grants
3
Denials
3
Total decisions
4
Grants
2
Denials
2
Total decisions
4
Grants
0
Denials
4
Total decisions
4
Grants
0
Denials
4
Total decisions
4
Grants
0
Denials
4
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.