Honduras
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
137
Grants
6
Denials
131
Grant rate: 4.4%Denial rate: 95.6%
Immigration judge
Steven J Connelly
Community discussion · 0Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
- Status
- active
- Data source
- EOIR Case Data
Grant rate
25.3%
269 / 1062
Total decisions
1062
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
25.3%
Grants: 269
Denial rate
74.7%
Denials: 793
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
Judge profile
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Attorney General Eric Holder appointed Judge Connelly in October 2010. Judge Connelly received a bachelor of arts degree in 1983 and a juris doctorate in 1986, both from the State University of New York at Buffalo. From 2003 to October 2010, he worked as an assistant chief counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Buffalo, N.Y. From 1994 to 2003, Judge Connelly was a trial attorney and an assistant district counsel for the former Immigration and Naturalization Service, Buffalo. During that time, from 2000 to 2003, he was designated as a civil special assistant U.S. attorney for the Department of Justice, U.S. Attorney's Office, Western District of New York. From 1992 to 1994, Judge Connelly worked as an attorney for the International Institute of Buffalo, representing individuals in immigration court proceedings. From 1989 to 1992, he was an attorney in Buffalo for Serotte, Reich and Seipp, which specialized in the practice of U.S. immigration law. Judge Connelly is a member of the New York State Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Outcome distribution
Grants269 / 1062
Denials793 / 1062
Other relief0 / 1062
Community perspective
Community discussion
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Steven J Connelly.
0 topics
You can start with these public topics
- Share a public process or preparation experience
- Discuss how to interpret public data
- Ask a question without personal case details
Case details
0 rowsThis table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Case Ratio
-
Distribution
Showing 0 of 0
View by applicant nationality
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Honduras Sufficient sample | 137 | 6 | 131 | 4.4% | 95.6% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 80 | 1 | 79 | 1.3% | 98.8% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 67 | 5 | 62 | 7.5% | 92.5% | View details | |
Venezuela Sufficient sample | 57 | 20 | 37 | 35.1% | 64.9% | View details | |
Cuba Sufficient sample | 43 | 21 | 22 | 48.8% | 51.2% | View details | |
Niue Sufficient sample | 43 | 25 | 18 | 58.1% | 41.9% | View details | |
Cameroon Sufficient sample | 41 | 27 | 14 | 65.9% | 34.1% | View details | |
Mexico Sufficient sample | 41 | 2 | 39 | 4.9% | 95.1% | View details | |
Ecuador Sufficient sample | 38 | 3 | 35 | 7.9% | 92.1% | View details | |
Somalia Sufficient sample | 36 | 17 | 19 | 47.2% | 52.8% | View details | |
Turkiye Sufficient sample | 35 | 12 | 23 | 34.3% | 65.7% | View details | |
Brazil Sufficient sample | 33 | 0 | 33 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Eritrea Moderate sample | 29 | 15 | 14 | 51.7% | 48.3% | View details | |
Colombia Moderate sample | 28 | 2 | 26 | 7.1% | 92.9% | View details | |
Russia Moderate sample | 27 | 24 | 3 | 88.9% | 11.1% | View details | |
Afghanistan Moderate sample | 26 | 19 | 7 | 73.1% | 26.9% | View details | |
Jamaica Moderate sample | 26 | 3 | 23 | 11.5% | 88.5% | View details | |
Bulgaria Moderate sample | 20 | 14 | 6 | 70.0% | 30.0% | View details | |
India Moderate sample | 18 | 4 | 14 | 22.2% | 77.8% | View details | |
Nicaragua Moderate sample | 18 | 5 | 13 | 27.8% | 72.2% | View details |
View details
Guatemala
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
80
Grants
1
Denials
79
Grant rate: 1.3%Denial rate: 98.8%
Spain
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
67
Grants
5
Denials
62
Grant rate: 7.5%Denial rate: 92.5%
Venezuela
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
57
Grants
20
Denials
37
Grant rate: 35.1%Denial rate: 64.9%
Cuba
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
43
Grants
21
Denials
22
Grant rate: 48.8%Denial rate: 51.2%
Niue
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
43
Grants
25
Denials
18
Grant rate: 58.1%Denial rate: 41.9%
Cameroon
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
41
Grants
27
Denials
14
Grant rate: 65.9%Denial rate: 34.1%
Mexico
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
41
Grants
2
Denials
39
Grant rate: 4.9%Denial rate: 95.1%
Ecuador
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
38
Grants
3
Denials
35
Grant rate: 7.9%Denial rate: 92.1%
Somalia
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
36
Grants
17
Denials
19
Grant rate: 47.2%Denial rate: 52.8%
Turkiye
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
35
Grants
12
Denials
23
Grant rate: 34.3%Denial rate: 65.7%
Brazil
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
33
Grants
0
Denials
33
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Eritrea
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
29
Grants
15
Denials
14
Grant rate: 51.7%Denial rate: 48.3%
Colombia
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
28
Grants
2
Denials
26
Grant rate: 7.1%Denial rate: 92.9%
Russia
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
27
Grants
24
Denials
3
Grant rate: 88.9%Denial rate: 11.1%
Afghanistan
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
26
Grants
19
Denials
7
Grant rate: 73.1%Denial rate: 26.9%
Jamaica
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
26
Grants
3
Denials
23
Grant rate: 11.5%Denial rate: 88.5%
Bulgaria
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
20
Grants
14
Denials
6
Grant rate: 70.0%Denial rate: 30.0%
India
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
18
Grants
4
Denials
14
Grant rate: 22.2%Denial rate: 77.8%
Nicaragua
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
18
Grants
5
Denials
13
Grant rate: 27.8%Denial rate: 72.2%
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Other judges at the same immigration court
Mary C Baumgarten
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 11.6%
- Denial Rate
- 88.4%
Denise Hochul
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 46.6%
- Denial Rate
- 53.4%
Brandon Jaroch
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 0.0%
- Denial Rate
- 100.0%
Brandi Lohr
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 26.2%
- Denial Rate
- 73.8%
Michael Rocco
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 18.9%
- Denial Rate
- 81.1%
Walter H. Ruehle
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 35.9%
- Denial Rate
- 64.1%
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.