Ecuador
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
35
Grants
0
Denials
35
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
26.2%
74 / 282
Total decisions
282
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
26.2%
Grants: 74
Denial rate
73.8%
Denials: 208
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Brandi M. Lohr was appointed as an immigration judge to begin hearing cases in August 2023. Judge Lohr earned a Bachelor of Arts in 2002 from the State University of New York at Buffalo and a Juris Doctor in 2007 from Duquesne University. From 2010 to 2023, she served as an assistant chief counsel, Office of the Principal Legal Advisor, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security (DHS), in Batavia and Buffalo, New York. From 2007 to 2010, she served as a management and program analyst and presidential management fellow, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, DHS, in Buffalo and Washington, D.C. Judge Lohr is a member of the Pennsylvania Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Brandi Lohr.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ecuador Sufficient sample | 35 | 0 | 35 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Afghanistan Moderate sample | 22 | 15 | 7 | 68.2% | 31.8% | View details | |
Turkiye Moderate sample | 15 | 9 | 6 | 60.0% | 40.0% | View details | |
Bulgaria Moderate sample | 14 | 0 | 14 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Brazil Moderate sample | 13 | 0 | 13 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Niue Moderate sample | 12 | 4 | 8 | 33.3% | 66.7% | View details | |
Russia Moderate sample | 12 | 10 | 2 | 83.3% | 16.7% | View details | |
Peru Moderate sample | 11 | 0 | 11 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Venezuela Moderate sample | 11 | 3 | 8 | 27.3% | 72.7% | View details | |
Angola Small sample | 9 | 3 | 6 | 33.3% | 66.7% | View details | |
Guatemala Small sample | 9 | 1 | 8 | 11.1% | 88.9% | View details | |
Guinea Small sample | 8 | 3 | 5 | 37.5% | 62.5% | View details | |
Mauritania Small sample | 8 | 1 | 7 | 12.5% | 87.5% | View details | |
India Small sample | 7 | 1 | 6 | 14.3% | 85.7% | View details | |
Switzerland Small sample | 7 | 3 | 4 | 42.9% | 57.1% | View details | |
Cuba Small sample | 6 | 0 | 6 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Pakistan Small sample | 6 | 3 | 3 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Russia Small sample | 6 | 2 | 4 | 33.3% | 66.7% | View details | |
Sri Lanka Small sample | 6 | 1 | 5 | 16.7% | 83.3% | View details | |
Somalia Small sample | 5 | 4 | 1 | 80.0% | 20.0% | View details |
Total decisions
35
Grants
0
Denials
35
Total decisions
22
Grants
15
Denials
7
Total decisions
15
Grants
9
Denials
6
Total decisions
14
Grants
0
Denials
14
Total decisions
13
Grants
0
Denials
13
Total decisions
12
Grants
4
Denials
8
Total decisions
12
Grants
10
Denials
2
Total decisions
11
Grants
0
Denials
11
Total decisions
11
Grants
3
Denials
8
Total decisions
9
Grants
3
Denials
6
Total decisions
9
Grants
1
Denials
8
Total decisions
8
Grants
3
Denials
5
Total decisions
8
Grants
1
Denials
7
Total decisions
7
Grants
1
Denials
6
Total decisions
7
Grants
3
Denials
4
Total decisions
6
Grants
0
Denials
6
Total decisions
6
Grants
3
Denials
3
Total decisions
6
Grants
2
Denials
4
Total decisions
6
Grants
1
Denials
5
Total decisions
5
Grants
4
Denials
1
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.