Mexico
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
267
Grants
25
Denials
242
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
23.8%
343 / 1441
Total decisions
1441
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
23.8%
Grants: 343
Denial rate
76.2%
Denials: 1098
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Attorney General William P. Barr appointed David W. Evans as an immigration judge in March 2020. Judge Evans earned a Bachelor of Arts in 1993 from the University of California, Davisand a Juris Doctor in 1993 from the University of Dayton School of Law. From 2016 to 2020, heserved as an administrative law judge, Office of Administrative Law Judge, State of Montana,Department of Public Health and Human Services, Child Support Enforcement Division, in Helena. From 2015 to 2016, he served as an administrative law judge for the Montana Department of Labor and Industry, in Helena. From 1994 to 2015, he was in private practice, in Vancouver, Washington. Judge Evans is a member of the Montana State Bar and Washington State Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to David W Evans.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mexico Sufficient sample | 267 | 25 | 242 | 9.4% | 90.6% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 132 | 24 | 108 | 18.2% | 81.8% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 123 | 24 | 99 | 19.5% | 80.5% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 116 | 8 | 108 | 6.9% | 93.1% | View details | |
India Sufficient sample | 89 | 24 | 65 | 27.0% | 73.0% | View details | |
Russia Sufficient sample | 89 | 55 | 34 | 61.8% | 38.2% | View details | |
Venezuela Sufficient sample | 86 | 17 | 69 | 19.8% | 80.2% | View details | |
Brazil Sufficient sample | 72 | 1 | 71 | 1.4% | 98.6% | View details | |
Colombia Sufficient sample | 69 | 7 | 62 | 10.1% | 89.9% | View details | |
Peru Sufficient sample | 68 | 1 | 67 | 1.5% | 98.5% | View details | |
Niue Sufficient sample | 59 | 12 | 47 | 20.3% | 79.7% | View details | |
Afghanistan Sufficient sample | 35 | 34 | 1 | 97.1% | 2.9% | View details | |
Ukraine Moderate sample | 23 | 20 | 3 | 87.0% | 13.0% | View details | |
Eritrea Moderate sample | 16 | 10 | 6 | 62.5% | 37.5% | View details | |
Moldova Moderate sample | 13 | 2 | 11 | 15.4% | 84.6% | View details | |
Romania Moderate sample | 13 | 0 | 13 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Switzerland Moderate sample | 13 | 7 | 6 | 53.8% | 46.2% | View details | |
Madagascar Moderate sample | 11 | 5 | 6 | 45.5% | 54.5% | View details | |
Somalia Moderate sample | 11 | 6 | 5 | 54.5% | 45.5% | View details | |
Angola Small sample | 9 | 3 | 6 | 33.3% | 66.7% | View details |
Total decisions
267
Grants
25
Denials
242
Total decisions
132
Grants
24
Denials
108
Total decisions
123
Grants
24
Denials
99
Total decisions
116
Grants
8
Denials
108
Total decisions
89
Grants
24
Denials
65
Total decisions
89
Grants
55
Denials
34
Total decisions
86
Grants
17
Denials
69
Total decisions
72
Grants
1
Denials
71
Total decisions
69
Grants
7
Denials
62
Total decisions
68
Grants
1
Denials
67
Total decisions
59
Grants
12
Denials
47
Total decisions
35
Grants
34
Denials
1
Total decisions
23
Grants
20
Denials
3
Total decisions
16
Grants
10
Denials
6
Total decisions
13
Grants
2
Denials
11
Total decisions
13
Grants
0
Denials
13
Total decisions
13
Grants
7
Denials
6
Total decisions
11
Grants
5
Denials
6
Total decisions
11
Grants
6
Denials
5
Total decisions
9
Grants
3
Denials
6
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.