Spain
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
63
Grants
1
Denials
62
Grant rate: 1.6%Denial rate: 98.4%
Immigration judge
Daniel L. Kahn
Community discussion · 0Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
- Status
- active
- Data source
- EOIR Case Data
Grant rate
7.6%
31 / 407
Total decisions
407
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
7.6%
Grants: 31
Denial rate
92.4%
Denials: 376
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
Outcome distribution
Grants31 / 407
Denials376 / 407
Other relief0 / 407
Community perspective
Community discussion
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Daniel L. Kahn.
0 topics
You can start with these public topics
- Share a public process or preparation experience
- Discuss how to interpret public data
- Ask a question without personal case details
Case details
0 rowsThis table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Case Ratio
-
Distribution
Showing 0 of 0
View by applicant nationality
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Spain Sufficient sample | 63 | 1 | 62 | 1.6% | 98.4% | View details | |
Niue Sufficient sample | 53 | 4 | 49 | 7.5% | 92.5% | View details | |
Iran Sufficient sample | 37 | 10 | 27 | 27.0% | 73.0% | View details | |
Poland Moderate sample | 27 | 0 | 27 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Romania Moderate sample | 24 | 0 | 24 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Guatemala Moderate sample | 22 | 0 | 22 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Cuba Moderate sample | 21 | 0 | 21 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Ethiopia Moderate sample | 17 | 2 | 15 | 11.8% | 88.2% | View details | |
Afghanistan Moderate sample | 16 | 6 | 10 | 37.5% | 62.5% | View details | |
India Moderate sample | 16 | 0 | 16 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Switzerland Moderate sample | 14 | 0 | 14 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Former Countries Moderate sample | 12 | 0 | 12 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Sri Lanka Moderate sample | 11 | 2 | 9 | 18.2% | 81.8% | View details | |
Honduras Moderate sample | 10 | 0 | 10 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Vietnam Small sample | 8 | 2 | 6 | 25.0% | 75.0% | View details | |
Hungary Small sample | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Myanmar (Burma) Small sample | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Peru Small sample | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Libya Small sample | 4 | 3 | 1 | 75.0% | 25.0% | View details | |
Former Countries Small sample | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details |
View details
Niue
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
53
Grants
4
Denials
49
Grant rate: 7.5%Denial rate: 92.5%
Iran
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
37
Grants
10
Denials
27
Grant rate: 27.0%Denial rate: 73.0%
Poland
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
27
Grants
0
Denials
27
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Romania
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
24
Grants
0
Denials
24
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Guatemala
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
22
Grants
0
Denials
22
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Cuba
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
21
Grants
0
Denials
21
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Ethiopia
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
17
Grants
2
Denials
15
Grant rate: 11.8%Denial rate: 88.2%
Afghanistan
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
16
Grants
6
Denials
10
Grant rate: 37.5%Denial rate: 62.5%
India
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
16
Grants
0
Denials
16
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Switzerland
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
14
Grants
0
Denials
14
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Former Countries
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
12
Grants
0
Denials
12
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Sri Lanka
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
11
Grants
2
Denials
9
Grant rate: 18.2%Denial rate: 81.8%
Honduras
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
10
Grants
0
Denials
10
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Vietnam
Small sampleTotal decisions
8
Grants
2
Denials
6
Grant rate: 25.0%Denial rate: 75.0%
Hungary
Small sampleTotal decisions
5
Grants
0
Denials
5
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Myanmar (Burma)
Small sampleTotal decisions
5
Grants
0
Denials
5
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Peru
Small sampleTotal decisions
5
Grants
0
Denials
5
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Libya
Small sampleTotal decisions
4
Grants
3
Denials
1
Grant rate: 75.0%Denial rate: 25.0%
Former Countries
Small sampleTotal decisions
3
Grants
0
Denials
3
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Other judges at the same immigration court
David W Evans
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 23.8%
- Denial Rate
- 76.2%
Shane E Johnson
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 16.3%
- Denial Rate
- 83.8%
Kenneth Josephson
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 32.1%
- Denial Rate
- 67.9%
Edward R. Kandler
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 37.6%
- Denial Rate
- 62.4%
Robert B.C McSeveney
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 29.2%
- Denial Rate
- 70.8%
William F. JR. Nail
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 6.8%
- Denial Rate
- 93.2%
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.