Spain
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
102
Grants
4
Denials
98
Grant rate: 3.9%Denial rate: 96.1%
Immigration judge
William F. JR. Nail
Community discussion · 0Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
- Status
- active
- Data source
- EOIR Case Data
Grant rate
6.8%
31 / 458
Total decisions
458
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
6.8%
Grants: 31
Denial rate
93.2%
Denials: 427
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
Outcome distribution
Grants31 / 458
Denials427 / 458
Other relief0 / 458
Community perspective
Community discussion
Read public experiences and process discussions related to William F. JR. Nail.
0 topics
You can start with these public topics
- Share a public process or preparation experience
- Discuss how to interpret public data
- Ask a question without personal case details
Case details
0 rowsThis table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Case Ratio
-
Distribution
Showing 0 of 0
View by applicant nationality
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Spain Sufficient sample | 102 | 4 | 98 | 3.9% | 96.1% | View details | |
Iran Sufficient sample | 46 | 5 | 41 | 10.9% | 89.1% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 42 | 5 | 37 | 11.9% | 88.1% | View details | |
Niue Sufficient sample | 35 | 0 | 35 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Switzerland Moderate sample | 26 | 0 | 26 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
India Moderate sample | 25 | 0 | 25 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Haiti Moderate sample | 22 | 0 | 22 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Sri Lanka Moderate sample | 19 | 0 | 19 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Ethiopia Moderate sample | 15 | 3 | 12 | 20.0% | 80.0% | View details | |
Cuba Moderate sample | 13 | 1 | 12 | 7.7% | 92.3% | View details | |
Philippines Moderate sample | 10 | 0 | 10 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Afghanistan Small sample | 9 | 1 | 8 | 11.1% | 88.9% | View details | |
Libya Small sample | 9 | 4 | 5 | 44.4% | 55.6% | View details | |
Poland Small sample | 9 | 1 | 8 | 11.1% | 88.9% | View details | |
Myanmar (Burma) Small sample | 7 | 0 | 7 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Lebanon Small sample | 6 | 0 | 6 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Vietnam Small sample | 6 | 1 | 5 | 16.7% | 83.3% | View details | |
Egypt Small sample | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Former Countries Small sample | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Mexico Small sample | 5 | 1 | 4 | 20.0% | 80.0% | View details |
View details
Iran
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
46
Grants
5
Denials
41
Grant rate: 10.9%Denial rate: 89.1%
Guatemala
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
42
Grants
5
Denials
37
Grant rate: 11.9%Denial rate: 88.1%
Niue
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
35
Grants
0
Denials
35
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Switzerland
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
26
Grants
0
Denials
26
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
India
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
25
Grants
0
Denials
25
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Haiti
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
22
Grants
0
Denials
22
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Sri Lanka
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
19
Grants
0
Denials
19
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Ethiopia
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
15
Grants
3
Denials
12
Grant rate: 20.0%Denial rate: 80.0%
Cuba
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
13
Grants
1
Denials
12
Grant rate: 7.7%Denial rate: 92.3%
Philippines
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
10
Grants
0
Denials
10
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Afghanistan
Small sampleTotal decisions
9
Grants
1
Denials
8
Grant rate: 11.1%Denial rate: 88.9%
Libya
Small sampleTotal decisions
9
Grants
4
Denials
5
Grant rate: 44.4%Denial rate: 55.6%
Poland
Small sampleTotal decisions
9
Grants
1
Denials
8
Grant rate: 11.1%Denial rate: 88.9%
Myanmar (Burma)
Small sampleTotal decisions
7
Grants
0
Denials
7
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Lebanon
Small sampleTotal decisions
6
Grants
0
Denials
6
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Vietnam
Small sampleTotal decisions
6
Grants
1
Denials
5
Grant rate: 16.7%Denial rate: 83.3%
Egypt
Small sampleTotal decisions
5
Grants
0
Denials
5
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Former Countries
Small sampleTotal decisions
5
Grants
0
Denials
5
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Mexico
Small sampleTotal decisions
5
Grants
1
Denials
4
Grant rate: 20.0%Denial rate: 80.0%
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Other judges at the same immigration court
David W Evans
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 23.8%
- Denial Rate
- 76.2%
Shane E Johnson
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 16.3%
- Denial Rate
- 83.8%
Kenneth Josephson
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 32.1%
- Denial Rate
- 67.9%
Daniel L. Kahn
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 7.6%
- Denial Rate
- 92.4%
Edward R. Kandler
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 37.6%
- Denial Rate
- 62.4%
Robert B.C McSeveney
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 29.2%
- Denial Rate
- 70.8%
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.