Switzerland
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
209
Grants
122
Denials
87
Grant rate: 58.4%Denial rate: 41.6%
Immigration judge
Paul Grussendorf
Community discussion · 0Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
- Status
- active
- Data source
- EOIR Case Data
Grant rate
59.6%
515 / 864
Total decisions
864
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
59.6%
Grants: 515
Denial rate
40.4%
Denials: 349
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
Outcome distribution
Grants515 / 864
Denials349 / 864
Other relief0 / 864
Community perspective
Community discussion
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Paul Grussendorf.
0 topics
You can start with these public topics
- Share a public process or preparation experience
- Discuss how to interpret public data
- Ask a question without personal case details
Case details
0 rowsThis table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Case Ratio
-
Distribution
Showing 0 of 0
View by applicant nationality
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Switzerland Sufficient sample | 209 | 122 | 87 | 58.4% | 41.6% | View details | |
Liechtenstein Sufficient sample | 58 | 43 | 15 | 74.1% | 25.9% | View details | |
Russia Sufficient sample | 55 | 50 | 5 | 90.9% | 9.1% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 51 | 8 | 43 | 15.7% | 84.3% | View details | |
Albania Sufficient sample | 44 | 30 | 14 | 68.2% | 31.8% | View details | |
Sri Lanka Sufficient sample | 39 | 38 | 1 | 97.4% | 2.6% | View details | |
India Sufficient sample | 36 | 10 | 26 | 27.8% | 72.2% | View details | |
Pakistan Sufficient sample | 32 | 21 | 11 | 65.6% | 34.4% | View details | |
Armenia Moderate sample | 18 | 7 | 11 | 38.9% | 61.1% | View details | |
Indonesia Moderate sample | 15 | 8 | 7 | 53.3% | 46.7% | View details | |
Afghanistan Moderate sample | 13 | 10 | 3 | 76.9% | 23.1% | View details | |
Peru Moderate sample | 11 | 7 | 4 | 63.6% | 36.4% | View details | |
Spain Moderate sample | 11 | 4 | 7 | 36.4% | 63.6% | View details | |
Egypt Moderate sample | 10 | 7 | 3 | 70.0% | 30.0% | View details | |
Kampuchea Moderate sample | 10 | 7 | 3 | 70.0% | 30.0% | View details | |
Colombia Small sample | 9 | 1 | 8 | 11.1% | 88.9% | View details | |
Ethiopia Small sample | 9 | 6 | 3 | 66.7% | 33.3% | View details | |
Former Countries Small sample | 9 | 8 | 1 | 88.9% | 11.1% | View details | |
Romania Small sample | 9 | 6 | 3 | 66.7% | 33.3% | View details | |
Ukraine Small sample | 9 | 7 | 2 | 77.8% | 22.2% | View details |
View details
Liechtenstein
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
58
Grants
43
Denials
15
Grant rate: 74.1%Denial rate: 25.9%
Russia
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
55
Grants
50
Denials
5
Grant rate: 90.9%Denial rate: 9.1%
Guatemala
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
51
Grants
8
Denials
43
Grant rate: 15.7%Denial rate: 84.3%
Albania
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
44
Grants
30
Denials
14
Grant rate: 68.2%Denial rate: 31.8%
Sri Lanka
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
39
Grants
38
Denials
1
Grant rate: 97.4%Denial rate: 2.6%
India
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
36
Grants
10
Denials
26
Grant rate: 27.8%Denial rate: 72.2%
Pakistan
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
32
Grants
21
Denials
11
Grant rate: 65.6%Denial rate: 34.4%
Armenia
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
18
Grants
7
Denials
11
Grant rate: 38.9%Denial rate: 61.1%
Indonesia
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
15
Grants
8
Denials
7
Grant rate: 53.3%Denial rate: 46.7%
Afghanistan
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
13
Grants
10
Denials
3
Grant rate: 76.9%Denial rate: 23.1%
Peru
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
11
Grants
7
Denials
4
Grant rate: 63.6%Denial rate: 36.4%
Spain
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
11
Grants
4
Denials
7
Grant rate: 36.4%Denial rate: 63.6%
Egypt
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
10
Grants
7
Denials
3
Grant rate: 70.0%Denial rate: 30.0%
Kampuchea
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
10
Grants
7
Denials
3
Grant rate: 70.0%Denial rate: 30.0%
Colombia
Small sampleTotal decisions
9
Grants
1
Denials
8
Grant rate: 11.1%Denial rate: 88.9%
Ethiopia
Small sampleTotal decisions
9
Grants
6
Denials
3
Grant rate: 66.7%Denial rate: 33.3%
Former Countries
Small sampleTotal decisions
9
Grants
8
Denials
1
Grant rate: 88.9%Denial rate: 11.1%
Romania
Small sampleTotal decisions
9
Grants
6
Denials
3
Grant rate: 66.7%Denial rate: 33.3%
Ukraine
Small sampleTotal decisions
9
Grants
7
Denials
2
Grant rate: 77.8%Denial rate: 22.2%
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Other judges at the same immigration court
Craig De Bernardis
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 35.0%
- Denial Rate
- 65.0%
Antonio Capistrano
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 33.3%
- Denial Rate
- 66.7%
John B Carle
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 35.6%
- Denial Rate
- 64.3%
Patrick J Ehlers
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 49.6%
- Denial Rate
- 50.4%
Lauren T Farber
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 49.1%
- Denial Rate
- 50.9%
Donald V. Ferlise
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 13.0%
- Denial Rate
- 87.0%
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.