Spain
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
57
Grants
3
Denials
54
Grant rate: 5.3%Denial rate: 94.7%
Immigration judge
Denise A Hinds Roach
Community discussion · 0Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
- Status
- active
- Data source
- EOIR Case Data
Grant rate
23.5%
52 / 221
Total decisions
221
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
23.5%
Grants: 52
Denial rate
76.5%
Denials: 169
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
Judge profile
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Attorney General William P. Barr appointed Denise A. Hinds Roach as an immigration judge in June 2020. Judge Hinds Roach earned a Bachelor of Arts in 1982 from Duquesne University anda Juris Doctor in 1986 from Duquesne University School of Law. From 2012 to 2019, she servedas a family court judge, in St. Croix, Virgin Islands. During her term as a family court judge, shealso served as a designated Supreme Court justice on the U.S. Virgin Islands Supreme Court.From 1994 to 2012, she served as an assistant U.S. attorney at the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of the Virgin Islands, in St. Croix, Virgin Islands. During that time, from 2006 to 2007,she also served as deputy criminal chief, U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of the Virgin Islands. In 1994, she served as an assistant attorney general with the U.S. Virgin Islands Department of Justice. From 1991 to 1994, she served as an assistant solicitor with the Fulton County Solicitor’s Office, in Atlanta. Judge Hinds Roach is a member of the Georgia State Bar,Pennsylvania State Bar, and U.S. Virgin Islands Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Outcome distribution
Grants52 / 221
Denials169 / 221
Other relief0 / 221
Community perspective
Community discussion
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Denise A Hinds Roach.
0 topics
You can start with these public topics
- Share a public process or preparation experience
- Discuss how to interpret public data
- Ask a question without personal case details
Case details
0 rowsThis table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Case Ratio
-
Distribution
Showing 0 of 0
View by applicant nationality
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Spain Sufficient sample | 57 | 3 | 54 | 5.3% | 94.7% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 35 | 1 | 34 | 2.9% | 97.1% | View details | |
Honduras Moderate sample | 29 | 0 | 29 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Mexico Moderate sample | 17 | 9 | 8 | 52.9% | 47.1% | View details | |
Ecuador Moderate sample | 12 | 1 | 11 | 8.3% | 91.7% | View details | |
Brazil Small sample | 8 | 1 | 7 | 12.5% | 87.5% | View details | |
India Small sample | 8 | 3 | 5 | 37.5% | 62.5% | View details | |
Nicaragua Small sample | 8 | 8 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Venezuela Small sample | 7 | 4 | 3 | 57.1% | 42.9% | View details | |
Russia Small sample | 5 | 2 | 3 | 40.0% | 60.0% | View details | |
Albania Small sample | 3 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Belize Small sample | 3 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Türkiye Small sample | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Cuba Small sample | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Georgia Small sample | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Nepal Small sample | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Switzerland Small sample | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Ukraine Small sample | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Unknown Nationality Small sample | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Bermuda Small sample | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details |
View details
Guatemala
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
35
Grants
1
Denials
34
Grant rate: 2.9%Denial rate: 97.1%
Honduras
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
29
Grants
0
Denials
29
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Mexico
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
17
Grants
9
Denials
8
Grant rate: 52.9%Denial rate: 47.1%
Ecuador
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
12
Grants
1
Denials
11
Grant rate: 8.3%Denial rate: 91.7%
Brazil
Small sampleTotal decisions
8
Grants
1
Denials
7
Grant rate: 12.5%Denial rate: 87.5%
India
Small sampleTotal decisions
8
Grants
3
Denials
5
Grant rate: 37.5%Denial rate: 62.5%
Nicaragua
Small sampleTotal decisions
8
Grants
8
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
Venezuela
Small sampleTotal decisions
7
Grants
4
Denials
3
Grant rate: 57.1%Denial rate: 42.9%
Russia
Small sampleTotal decisions
5
Grants
2
Denials
3
Grant rate: 40.0%Denial rate: 60.0%
Albania
Small sampleTotal decisions
3
Grants
3
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
Belize
Small sampleTotal decisions
3
Grants
3
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
Türkiye
Small sampleTotal decisions
3
Grants
0
Denials
3
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Cuba
Small sampleTotal decisions
2
Grants
2
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
Georgia
Small sampleTotal decisions
2
Grants
1
Denials
1
Grant rate: 50.0%Denial rate: 50.0%
Nepal
Small sampleTotal decisions
2
Grants
1
Denials
1
Grant rate: 50.0%Denial rate: 50.0%
Switzerland
Small sampleTotal decisions
2
Grants
2
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
Ukraine
Small sampleTotal decisions
2
Grants
2
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
Unknown Nationality
Small sampleTotal decisions
2
Grants
0
Denials
2
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Bermuda
Small sampleTotal decisions
1
Grants
1
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Other judges at the same immigration court
Maria I Akalski
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 4.3%
- Denial Rate
- 95.7%
Richard Bailey
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 19.8%
- Denial Rate
- 80.2%
Shana W Chen
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 8.5%
- Denial Rate
- 91.5%
David Cheng
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 20.9%
- Denial Rate
- 79.1%
Henry S. Dogin
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 31.4%
- Denial Rate
- 68.6%
Leo A Finston
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 39.1%
- Denial Rate
- 60.9%
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.