Switzerland
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
95
Grants
38
Denials
57
Grant rate: 40.0%Denial rate: 60.0%
Immigration judge
Nicole Kim
Community discussion · 0Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
- Status
- active
- Data source
- EOIR Case Data
Grant rate
21.6%
154 / 712
Total decisions
712
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
21.6%
Grants: 154
Denial rate
78.4%
Denials: 558
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
Outcome distribution
Grants154 / 712
Denials558 / 712
Other relief0 / 712
Community perspective
Community discussion
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Nicole Kim.
0 topics
You can start with these public topics
- Share a public process or preparation experience
- Discuss how to interpret public data
- Ask a question without personal case details
Case details
0 rowsThis table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Case Ratio
-
Distribution
Showing 0 of 0
View by applicant nationality
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Switzerland Sufficient sample | 95 | 38 | 57 | 40.0% | 60.0% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 56 | 7 | 49 | 12.5% | 87.5% | View details | |
India Sufficient sample | 52 | 8 | 44 | 15.4% | 84.6% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 44 | 0 | 44 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Egypt Sufficient sample | 43 | 12 | 31 | 27.9% | 72.1% | View details | |
Philippines Sufficient sample | 34 | 0 | 34 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Liechtenstein Sufficient sample | 30 | 13 | 17 | 43.3% | 56.7% | View details | |
Pakistan Moderate sample | 25 | 6 | 19 | 24.0% | 76.0% | View details | |
Peru Moderate sample | 24 | 1 | 23 | 4.2% | 95.8% | View details | |
Former Countries Moderate sample | 22 | 8 | 14 | 36.4% | 63.6% | View details | |
Colombia Moderate sample | 21 | 3 | 18 | 14.3% | 85.7% | View details | |
Nicaragua Moderate sample | 20 | 4 | 16 | 20.0% | 80.0% | View details | |
Ecuador Moderate sample | 16 | 0 | 16 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Haiti Moderate sample | 15 | 0 | 15 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Russia Moderate sample | 15 | 5 | 10 | 33.3% | 66.7% | View details | |
Ghana Moderate sample | 14 | 0 | 14 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Albania Moderate sample | 12 | 1 | 11 | 8.3% | 91.7% | View details | |
Bulgaria Moderate sample | 12 | 0 | 12 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Ukraine Moderate sample | 11 | 2 | 9 | 18.2% | 81.8% | View details | |
Honduras Small sample | 9 | 0 | 9 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details |
View details
Guatemala
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
56
Grants
7
Denials
49
Grant rate: 12.5%Denial rate: 87.5%
India
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
52
Grants
8
Denials
44
Grant rate: 15.4%Denial rate: 84.6%
Spain
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
44
Grants
0
Denials
44
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Egypt
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
43
Grants
12
Denials
31
Grant rate: 27.9%Denial rate: 72.1%
Philippines
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
34
Grants
0
Denials
34
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Liechtenstein
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
30
Grants
13
Denials
17
Grant rate: 43.3%Denial rate: 56.7%
Pakistan
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
25
Grants
6
Denials
19
Grant rate: 24.0%Denial rate: 76.0%
Peru
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
24
Grants
1
Denials
23
Grant rate: 4.2%Denial rate: 95.8%
Former Countries
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
22
Grants
8
Denials
14
Grant rate: 36.4%Denial rate: 63.6%
Colombia
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
21
Grants
3
Denials
18
Grant rate: 14.3%Denial rate: 85.7%
Nicaragua
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
20
Grants
4
Denials
16
Grant rate: 20.0%Denial rate: 80.0%
Ecuador
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
16
Grants
0
Denials
16
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Haiti
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
15
Grants
0
Denials
15
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Russia
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
15
Grants
5
Denials
10
Grant rate: 33.3%Denial rate: 66.7%
Ghana
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
14
Grants
0
Denials
14
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Albania
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
12
Grants
1
Denials
11
Grant rate: 8.3%Denial rate: 91.7%
Bulgaria
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
12
Grants
0
Denials
12
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Ukraine
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
11
Grants
2
Denials
9
Grant rate: 18.2%Denial rate: 81.8%
Honduras
Small sampleTotal decisions
9
Grants
0
Denials
9
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Other judges at the same immigration court
Maria I Akalski
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 4.3%
- Denial Rate
- 95.7%
Richard Bailey
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 19.8%
- Denial Rate
- 80.2%
Shana W Chen
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 8.5%
- Denial Rate
- 91.5%
David Cheng
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 20.9%
- Denial Rate
- 79.1%
Henry S. Dogin
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 31.4%
- Denial Rate
- 68.6%
Leo A Finston
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 39.1%
- Denial Rate
- 60.9%
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.